Effects of Particle Volume Fraction on Dynamic Deformation Behaviors of B4C Reinforced Aluminum Matrix Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Particles size grading method was employed to fabricate aluminum matrix composites reinforced with 75% volume fraction B4C particles by squeeze casting. Dynamic behaviors of the composite was investigated and compared with 55 vol. % composite which were reinforced with particles of uniform size. The results showed that the flow stress increased but the fracture strain decreased with increasing reinforcement volume fraction. Furthermore, the dynamic behaviors of 55 vol. % composite were significantly affected by adiabatic heating softening which was demonstrated by the local melted matrix on the fracture surface and an increase-decrease tendency on flow stress and failure strain was obtained with increasing impact velocity. However, due to load redistribution caused by particles size grading, no melted region was found on the fracture surface and no increase-decrease tendency on flow stress and failure strain was observed for 75 vol. % composites under the same impact loading.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 535-537)

Pages:

110-116

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Christman, A. Needleman, S. Suresh: Acta Metall Vol. 37 (1989), p.3029

Google Scholar

[2] R. Kapoor, K.S. Vecchio: Mater Sci Eng A Vol. 202 (1995), p.63

Google Scholar

[3] Q. Wei, S. Cheng, K.T. Ramesh, E. Ma: Mater Sci Eng A Vol. 381 (2004), p.71

Google Scholar

[4] H. Zhang, K.T. Ramesh, E.S.C. Chin: Mater Sci Eng A Vol. 384 (2004), p.26

Google Scholar

[5] A. Razaghian, D. Yu, T. Chandra: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 58 (1998), p.293

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, Y. Xia: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 39 (2004), p.3191

Google Scholar

[7] L.H. Dai, Z. Ling, Y.L. Bai: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 61 (2001), p.1057

Google Scholar

[8] Z.H. Tan, B.J. Pang, B.Z. Gai, G.H. Wu, B. Jia: Mater Lett. Vol. 61 (2007), p.4606

Google Scholar

[9] Z.H. Tan, B.J. Pang, D.T. Qin, J.Y. Shi, B.Z. Gai: Mater Sci Eng A Vol. 489 (2008), p.302

Google Scholar

[10] D.Z. Zhu, Gaohui Wu, Guoqin Chen,Q. Zhang: Mater Sci Eng A Vol. 487 (2008), p.536

Google Scholar

[11] D.R. Chichili, K.T. Ramesh: Int. J. Solids Struct. Vol. 32 (1995), p.2609

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Li, K.T. Ramesh: Acta Mater Vol. 46 (1998), p.5633

Google Scholar

[13] M. Kouzeli, C.S. Marchi, A. Mortensen: Mater Sci Eng A Vol. 337 (2002), p.264

Google Scholar

[14] M.V. Hosur, J. Alexander, U.K. Vaidya, S. Jeenali: Compos. Struct. Vol. 52 (2001), p.405

Google Scholar

[15] Q. Wei, L. Kecskes, T. Jiao, K.T. Hartwig, K.T. Ramesh, E. Ma: Acta Mater Vol. 52 (2004), p.1859

Google Scholar

[16] C.R. Chen, S.Y. Qin, S.X. Li, J.L. Wen. Mater Sci Eng A Vol. 278 (2000), p.96

Google Scholar