Estimating the Energy Carbon Footprint of Huangshan National Park

Article Preview

Abstract:

Tourism is sensitive to global climate change and greenhouse gas emissions generated by the energy consumption restrict the sustainable development of tourism industry. Methods trying to make the tourism development of sustainability measurable are too confused to be of practical value. To overcome this obstacle, this paper built a Tourism Carbon Footprint Model based on energy consumption structure. With this TCF model, we analyzed carbon footprint of Huangshan between 2006 and 2009. We find that: (1) total carbon footprint of Huangshan increases from 2674.92 hm2 to 3456.76 hm2 at the annual rate of 7%; (2) energy consumption carbon footprint differs significantly in structure. The five kinds of energy carbon footprint, in the descending order, are the electricity, coal, diesel, gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas; (3) analysis of energy consumption carbon footprint shows that Huangshan is sustainable between 2006 and 2009.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 535-537)

Pages:

2214-2219

Citation:

Online since:

June 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jinhe Zhang, Jie Zhang. Acta Geographica Sinica Vol. 59(2004), pp.763-771.

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz.

Google Scholar

[3] Dwyer L, Forsyth P, Spurr R, etal. Journal of Sustainable Tourism Vol. 18(2010), pp.335-376.

Google Scholar

[4] Xuewang Dong. Measuring regional tourism carbon footprint based on input-output Analysis (2011), unpublished.

Google Scholar

[5] Jianhong Xiao, Aifen Yu, Min Wang. Tourism Science Vol. 25(2011), pp.58-66.

Google Scholar

[6] Jinhe Zhang. Acta Ecologica Sinica Vol. 28(2008), pp.2764-2773.

Google Scholar

[7] Peng Li, Jihua Huang, Yanfen Mo, Guihua Yang. Tourism Tribune Vol. 25 (2010), pp.27-34.

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http://www.parliament.uk.

Google Scholar

[9] Information on http://www.energetics.com.

Google Scholar

[10] Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Moran D, etal. National footprint and Biocapacity accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method, (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] Carbon Trust, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, British Standards Institution, 2008.Guide to PAS 2050—How to Assess the Carbon Footprint of Goods and Services.

Google Scholar

[12] Brownea D, O'Regans B, Moles R. Resources, Conservation and Recycling Vol. 54(2009), pp.113-122.

Google Scholar

[13] Peters G P. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Vol. 2(2010), pp.245-250.

Google Scholar

[14] Mathis Wackemagel. Ecological Economics Vol. 29(1999), pp.375-390.

Google Scholar

[15] Lenzen, M. and Murray, S.A. Ecological Economics Vol. 37(2001), pp.229-255.

Google Scholar

[16] Fen Luo, Yongde Zhong, Huaicai Wang. World Regional Studies Vol. 19(2010), pp.105-113.

Google Scholar

[17] Stefan G, Paul P, Jean P C, etal. Ecological Economics Vol. 54(2005), pp.417-434.

Google Scholar

[18] Jinhe Zhang, Jie Zhang, etal. Journal of Natural Resources Vol. 20(2005), pp.735-744.

Google Scholar

[19] Jinhe Zhang, Jie Zhang. Resources Science Vol.28 (2006), pp.196-203.

Google Scholar

[20] Jinhe Zhang, Jie Zhang. Areal Research and Development Vol. 26 (2007), pp.90-96.

Google Scholar

[21] Lin Lu, Jie Gong, Xiulong Jin. Geographical Research Vol. 30(2011), pp.219-223.

Google Scholar