Hydrothermal Oxidation of Phenol with H2O2

Ya Nan Jia

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.535-537.2475

Paper Titles

Electrodeposition of ZnO Nanosheet Structures and their Application for Glucose Biosensor
p.2450

Utilization of Scoria as PRB Reactive Media for the Removal of Petroleum Hydrocarbon from Groundwater
p.2457

Dilute Sulfuric Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover into Fermentable Sugars
p.2462

Synthesis and Electroluminescent Property of Bis{2-(naphtha [3,4]imidazol-2-Yl) Pyridinato} Magnesium
p.2469

Hydrothermal Oxidation of Phenol with H₂O₂
p.2475

The Stannous Complex of Succinimide as Multifuctional Additive for Lubricating Oils
p.2479

Preparation and Mechanism Analysis of High-Efficiency early Strength Agent
p.2483

A Novel Approach to Get Bisphenol-a Bis(Diphenyl phosphate)
p.2488

Synthesis and Properties of Silicone Modified Acrylate Emulsion
p.2491

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 535-537Hydrothermal Oxidation of Phenol with H2O2

Hydrothermal Oxidation of Phenol with H₂O₂

Abstract:

Hydrothermal oxidation of high-level phenol containing wastewater was performed in a continuous reactor. Results show that COD removal rate increases with the increase of ratio of the amount of H2O2 supplied to the stoichiometric demand of H2O2, K; However when K is more than 1.5, the amount of H2O2 supplied does not affect COD removal rate evidently. Under sub-critical conditions, COD removal rate depends on temperature and phenol feeding concentration, and pressure does not have significant effect. Under supercritical conditions, COD removal rate depends not only on the above mentioned conditions, but on water density as well. The performance of different catalysts used in the process was compared. The experimental results show that Cu (NO3)2 is the best one in the four catalysts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 535-537)

Pages:

2475-2478

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.535-537.2475

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2012

Authors:

Ya Nan Jia*

Keywords:

COD Removal Rate, Hydrogen Peroxide, Hydrothermal Oxidation, Phenol, Wastewater

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] B.B. Pruden, H. Le, Wet Air Oxidation of Soluble Components in Waste Water, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 54 (1976), pp.319-321.

DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450540413

Google Scholar

[2] A. Singh, K.K. Pant, K.D.P. Nigam, Catalytic Wet Oxidation of Phenol in a Trickle Bed Reactor, Chem. Eng. J. 103(2004), pp.51-57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2004.06.006

Google Scholar

[3] J.R. Portela, E.Nebot, E.Martinez. de la Ossa, Kinetic Comparation between Subcritical and Supercritical Water Oxidation of Phenol, Chem. Eng. J. 81(2001), pp.287-299.

DOI: 10.1016/s1385-8947(00)00226-6

Google Scholar

[4] Minok Koo, Won Kook Lee, Choul Ho Lee, New Reactor System for Supercritical Water Oxidation and its Application on Phenol Destruction, Chem. Eng. Sci, 52-7(1997), pp.1201-1210.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(96)00477-0

Google Scholar