Diffusion of Heavy Oil in SiO2 Model Catalyst and FCC Catalyst

Article Preview

Abstract:

Through the measured effective diffusion coefficients of Dagang vacuum residue supercritical fluid extraction and fractionation (SFEF) fractions in FCC catalysts and SiO2 model catalysts, the relation between pore size of catalyst and effective diffusion coefficient was researched and the restricted diffusion factor was calculated. The restricted diffusion factor in FCC catalysts is less than 1 and it is 1~2 times larger in catalyst with polystyrene (PS) template than in conventional FCC catalyst without template, indicating that the diffusion of SFEF fractions in the two FCC catalysts is restricted by the pore. When the average molecular diameter is less than 1.8 nm, the diffusion of SFEF fractions in SiO2 model catalyst which average pore diameter larger than 5.6 nm is unrestricted. The diffusion is restricted in the catalyst pores of less than 8 nm for SFEF fractions which diameter more than 1.8 nm. The tortuosity factor of SiO2 model catalyst is obtained to be 2.87, within the range of empirical value. The effective diffusion coefficient of the SFEF fractions in SiO2 model catalyst is two orders of magnitude larger than that in FCC catalyst with the same average pore diameter. This indicate that besides the ratio of molecular diameter to the pore diameter λ, the effective diffusion coefficient is also closely related to the pore structure of catalyst. Because SiO2 model catalyst has uniform pore size, the diffusion coefficient can be precisely correlated with pore size of catalyst, so it is a good model material for catalyst internal diffusion investigation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 550-553)

Pages:

158-163

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.M. Deen: AIChE J. Vol. 33 (1987), p.1409

Google Scholar

[2] R.E. Baltus: Fuel Sci. Tech. Int'l. Vol. 11 (1993), p.783

Google Scholar

[3] Chaohe Yang, Feng Du and Zhongxiang Han: Acta Petroleisinica(Petrol. Proc. Sec.) Vol. 16 (2000), p.17"In Chinese"

Google Scholar

[4] R.L. Nortz, R.E. Baltus and P. Rahimi: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Vol. 29 (1990), p. (1968)

Google Scholar

[5] E.M. Renkin: J. General Physiology Vol. 38 (1954), p.225

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Pawar and J.L. Anderson: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Vol. 32 (1993), p.743

Google Scholar

[7] C.H. Tsai, F.E. Massoth and S.Y. Lee: Fuel Process. Technol. Vol. 29 (1991), p.153

Google Scholar

[8] C.N. Satterfield, C.K. Colton and W.H. Pitcher Jr.: AIChE J. Vol. 19 (1973), p.628

Google Scholar

[9] R.E. Baltus and J.L. Anderson: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 38 (1983), p. (1959)

Google Scholar

[10] S.Y. Lee, J.D. Seader and C.H. Tsai: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Vol. 30 (1991), p.29

Google Scholar

[11] Ziyuan Liu, Shengli Chen and Peng Dong: Energy & Fuels Vol. 23 (2009), p.2862

Google Scholar

[12] Ziyuan Liu, Shengli Chen and Peng Dong: Energy & Fuels Vol. 24 (2010), p.2825

Google Scholar

[13] A. Chantong and F.E. Massoth: AIChE J. Vol. 29 (1983), p.725

Google Scholar

[14] Bingchen Zhu: Chemical reaction engineering (Chemistry industry press, Beijing 2007) "In Chinese"

Google Scholar