Comparison of Principal Factors between China Actual Environmental Risk (CAER) and China Zero Environmental Risk (CZER): Project Angle

Article Preview

Abstract:

Studies on comparison of principal factors between CAER (China Actual Environmental Risk) and CZER (China Zero Environmental Risk) from Project Angle are seldom found, so we studied the theme above in this thesis. By analysis, we have known that on one hand, there are such aspects in common as projects for resources excavation, and refinement, etc., projects for primary industries, other non-living projects, waste disposal, and general management between CAER and CZER. On the other hand, they are different in such aspects as chemical engineering projects and living projects only for CAER, and energy projects and public construction projects only for CZER. And our related advice is as follows: first, strict management on production of waste from such projects as public construction projects, resources excavation and refinement, natural resources, projects for primary industries, and other non-living projects. Secondly great encouragement to environment-friendly technological innovations in waste disposal, etc..

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 550-553)

Pages:

2263-2269

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Q. Liu, in: Economic Operation Risk Management, edited by H. Y. Tang, Universe Academic Press (2011), pp.146-157.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Caspary: Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. Vol. 27, No. 1 (2009), p.19–32.

Google Scholar

[3] P. H. Gleick, J. P. Holdren: American Journal of Public Health. Vol. 71, No. 9 (1981), pp.1046-1050.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Q. Liu: 80 Examples for the Taboos on Project Financing (BJ: Publishing House of Electronics industry, 2010). (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] R. W. England: Kyklos. Vol. 41, No. 3 (1988), pp.379-395.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Roberts, A. Weale: Innovation and Environmental Risk (Belhaven, 1991).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Somers, J. H. Svara: Public Administration Review. March/April (2009), pp.181-193.

Google Scholar