A Study of Experimental and Improved Absorption Model for the Spray Towers of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization

Article Preview

Abstract:

The wet flue gas desulfurization has been the most widely used in the coal-fired power plants because of high SO2 removal efficiency, reliability and low utility consumption. A mathematical model of limestone/gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system was developed based on the two-film theory of mass-transfer. In the one-dimensional two-film theory , the concentration of SO2 in the bulk of the liquid(cAs) is difficult to accurately determine. The authors derive the accurate calculation of the value of cAs on the basis of the one-dimensional mass transfer model, making the model in line with the actual process. The model predictions were verified by experimental data. Experimental investigations of the effects of different operating variables on the SO2 removal showed the reasonable process parameters such as the pH value of the liquid phase, droplet size of the spray and the flow rates of liquid and gas. Keep the slurry flow in a 50 ml/min, adjust the flue gas flow changes. Keep the flue gas flow in 5 l/min, adjust the flow slurry changes. The experimental results reveal that the model can describe the processes in this absorber well. Some experimental parameters (temperature, flue gas velocity) are difficult to accurately control, the model can give them fluence on the desulfurization efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 550-553)

Pages:

574-579

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Marocco, F. Inzoli, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 35 (2009) 185–194.

Google Scholar

[2] Gutierrez Ortiz FJ, Vidal F, Ollero P, Salvador L, Cortes V, Gimenez A. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006;45:1466–77.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang J, Wang Y, Wu D. Energy Convers Manage 2003;44:357–67.

Google Scholar

[4] Gutierrez Ortiz FJ, Vidal F, Ollero P, Salvador L, Cortes V, Gimenez A. Ind Eng Chem Res 2006;45:1466–77.

Google Scholar

[5] Roberts, D. L.; Friedlander, S. K. Sulfur Dioxide Transport Through Aqueous Solutions. AIChE J. 1980, 26, 593.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690260410

Google Scholar

[6] Chang, C. S.; Rochelle, G. T. SO2 Absorption into Aqueous Solutions. AIChE J. 1981, 27, 292.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690270217

Google Scholar

[7] Chang, C. Y.; Liu, I. H.; Chang, I. C.; Chou, Y. C.; Liu, S. C.; Shih, S. M.; Hwang, D. C. Chemosphere 1994, 28, 1217.

Google Scholar

[8] Hsu, Ch.; Shih, S.; Chang, Ch. Simulation of SO2 Absorption of Falling Water Drops. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1994, 72, 256.

Google Scholar

[9] Glomba Michal, Method for removing sulfur dioxide and fly ashes from boiler flue gases, Polish Patent PL-171523 (1997).

Google Scholar

[10] B.C. Meikap, G. Kundu, N.M. Biswas, Sep. Sci. Technol. 37 (2002) 3421–3442.

Google Scholar

[11] C.J. Tsai, C.H. Huang, H.H. Lu, Sep. Sci. Technol. 38 (2003) 1429–1434.

Google Scholar

[12] B.C. Meikap, G. Kundu, M.N. Biswas, Scrubbing of fly-ash laden SO2 in a modified multi-stage bubble column scrubber, AIChE J. 48 (2002) 2074–2083.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690480920

Google Scholar

[13] Dou BL, Byun YH, Hwang JH. Energy Fuels 2008;22:1041–5.

Google Scholar

[14] Binlin Dou, Weiguo Pan, Qiang Jin , Wenhuan Wang, Yu Li, Energy Conversion and Management 50 (2009) 2547–2553

Google Scholar

[15] A. L. Villanueva Perales, P. Ollero, F. J. Gutie´rrez Ortiz, and F. Vidal B., IND. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 8263–8272

DOI: 10.1021/ie071582x

Google Scholar

[16] Jerzy Warych and Marek Szymanowski, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 2597-2605

Google Scholar

[17] Yong Jia, Qin Zhong†, Xuyou Fan, Qianqiao Chen, and Haibo Sun,Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28 (4), 1058-1064 (2011)

Google Scholar

[18] Dagaonkar, M. V.; Beenackers, A. A. C. M.; Pangarkar, V. G. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56 (3), 1095–1101.

Google Scholar

[19] Liu S, Xiao W. Chem Eng Technol 2006;29:1167–73.

Google Scholar

[20] Warych, J.; Szymanowski, M.. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001,40, 2597–2605.

Google Scholar

[21] Bandyopadhyay, A.; Biswas, M. N.. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2006, 29 (1), 130–145.

Google Scholar

[22] Hongliang Gaoa, Caiting Li, Guangming Zeng etc. Separation and Purification Technology 76 (2011) 253–260

Google Scholar

[23] Romualdp, Bokotko, Janhupka, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1184-1189

Google Scholar

[24] Christine Roizard, Gabriel Wild, Chemical Engineering Science 57 (2002) 3479–3484

Google Scholar

[25] Zheng Lei ,Zhang Lei ,Kang Zijin , Zhao Qinxin ,Journal of Power Engineering,Vol.25 Sup.Oct.2005(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[26] Xiaojin Li , Zhi Zhen , Electric Power, 2010,11,0056-4(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[27] Guorong Liu , Zhengwei Wang , Yulei Wei , Qinglin Ji ,CIESC Journal,2010,09:2463-05(In Chinese)

Google Scholar