Process Parameters Optimization of the MTBE Reactive Distillation by Orthogonal Numberical Test and Least Square Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because of the large number of operating and equipment parameters of the reactive distillation(RD) and a strong coupling between them, it is difficult to find the optimal process parameters. A novel hybrid method on process parameters optimization of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) RD was developed in the paper. MTBE RD process was firstly simulated with Aspen Plus. Then based on the MTBE RD model, sensitivity analysis of various parameters was accomplished to determine the key decision parameters. After that, the orthogonal numerical tests were performed in feasible fields to obtain nearly optimal parameters. Finally, with the orthogonal numerical test results, the least square method was used to regress equation, which showed the relationship between objective function and the key decision parameters, thus determining the optimal operating parameters and equipment parameters. Results of analysis indicated that the combination of orthogonal numerical test and the least square method can be attractive since the number of tests was reduced substantially while the specification of the products can be met.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 550-553)

Pages:

947-952

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Dohery, M. F and Buzard G: Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 70 (1992) 5448-453.

Google Scholar

[2] Baur, R., AP Higler and R Taylor : Chem. Eng. J. 76 (2000) 33-37.

Google Scholar

[3] Srinivas, S., S.M. Mahajani, and R.K. Malik: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (2010) 9673-9692.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Tuchlenski, A Beckmann and D Reusch: Chem. Eng. Sci. 56 (2001) 387-394.

Google Scholar

[5] A.D. Estrada-Villagrana et al: Chem. Eng. Process. 45 (2006) 1036-1040.

Google Scholar

[6] C. P. Almeida-Rivera, P. L. J. Swinkels and J. Grievink: Comput. Chem. Eng. 28 (2004) 1997-2020.

Google Scholar

[7] Samborskaya, M., Mityanina, O. and Kravtsov: A: IEEE, (2010) 433-436.

Google Scholar

[8] Amnart Jantharasuk, Rafiqul Gani, Andrzej Gorak and Suttichai Assabumrungrat: Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89 (2011) 1295.

Google Scholar

[9] Huang, K.; Wang, S. J.and Ding, W: Chem. Eng. Sci. 63 (2008) 2119-2134.

Google Scholar

[10] Santoso, H., J. Bao, and P. Lee: Chemical Product and Process M. 4 (2009) 6.

Google Scholar

[11] Bhanu Pratap Singh et al. Journal of Loss Prevention. 18 (2005) 283-292.

Google Scholar

[12] W.G. Cui, X.H. Li and S.B. Zhou: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 103 (2007) 3105-3112.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Bag, A. Trivedi and A. De. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 38 (2008) 575-585.

Google Scholar

[14] W.S. Lu and S.C. Pei: Transactions on signal processing. 46 (1998) 1-10.

Google Scholar

[15] Andrew Fitzgibbon. Maurizio Pilu and Robert B. Fisher: Transaction on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. 21 (1999) 476-480.

Google Scholar

[16] Bo-Nan Jiang: Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 152 (1998) 239-257.

Google Scholar

[17] Warren D. Seider, J. D. Seader , Daniel R. Lewin. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (2003).

Google Scholar

[18] Fan, D. Y. and Chen, Y. H: Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics; Zhejiang University Press: China, (1996) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar