Study on Forming Mechanism of Lamination Defect of AH36 Shipbuilding Plate Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

The lamination defect makes the mechanical properties deterioration along the thickness of steel plate and therefore finding out the forming mechanism is of great significance for production of shipbuilding plate steel. The tensile fracture and microstructure characteristics on AH36 shipbuilding plate steel of lamination defect were studied with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), etc. The results show that the strength-toughness properties vary widely at different thickness of the steel plate due to different ferrite grain size, and the center zone firstly yields and steps into plastic deformation stage due to coarse ferrite grain subjected to tensile stress, while the surface zone is still in elastic deformation stage due to relatively fine ferrite grain. The inconsistency of deformation and fracture leads to fracture separation, namely lamination. The continuous banded Widmanstätten structure, strip-shaped sulphide inclusions and mixed ferrite grain distributed at the center of shipbuilding plate steel create conditions for the lamination defect, which are important reasons for fracture separation. Widmanstätten structure at the center of steel plate has relationship with coarse austenite grain, and strip-shaped sulphide inclusions have relationship with centerline segregation of continuous casting slab during solidification process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 562-564)

Pages:

106-110

Citation:

Online since:

August 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pozuelo M, Carreno F, Ruano O A. Materials Science Forum 426(2003) 83-88.

Google Scholar

[2] N. Narasaiah, K.K. Ray. Materials Science and Engineering 392(2005) 269-277.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Inagaki. Z. Metallkd 79(1988) 364-374.

Google Scholar

[4] Chen Fang-yu, Zou De-hui, Chen Ji-qin. Research on Iron & Steel 38(2010) 21-25.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Shanmugam, S.D. Pathak. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 53(1996) 991-1005.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Tanaka. International Metals Reviews 26(1981) 185-212.

Google Scholar

[7] Keiro Tokaji, Takeshi Ogawa, Yukio Harada. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 9(1986) 205-217.

Google Scholar

[8] Debalay Chakrabarti, Claire Davis, Martin Strangwood. Materials Characterization 58(2007) 423-438.

Google Scholar

[9] F.J. Gil, M.P. Ginebra, J.M. Manero, et al. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 329(2001) 142-152.

Google Scholar

[10] Dominic Phelan, Nicole Stanford, Rian Dippenaar. Materials Science and Engineering A 407(2005) 127-134.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhang Chao, Song Chang, Han Bin, et al. Journal of Iron and Steel Research 23(2011) 50-54.

Google Scholar

[12] Wu Ying, Tang Zhi-xiu, Yang De-zhuang, et al. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 6(1996) 99-105.

Google Scholar