Productivity Study and Line Balancing of GGMG & CALICO Production Line

Article Preview

Abstract:

Assembly line balancing is assumed to have fixed task within specified task time during the initial stage of the mass production. The problem of current case study of this assembly line was the production line cannot meet the expected output plan with imbalance station cycle time. In this paper, productivity study and line balancing is applied to improve production line of GGMG & CALICO. The desired cycle time defined using the Standard Time Data (STD) which required the person to perform assign task till completion by defining the performance rating of person. The proposed solution proved by the implementation analysis conducted in the research. The results showed that the productivity of production line which is tremendously increased within 50% after implementation. There are six factors identified during the study which are bottleneck stations, workpiece flow, line layout, ergonomic, resource assignment and buffer allocation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

700-704

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Heizer, B. Render, Principles of operation management: Productivity variables. PearsonEducation, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2005) 16-402.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Greasley Operation Management: Line balancing. John Wiley &Sons Ltd, the Atrium, Southern Gate, Chicester, England (2006) 83-84.

Google Scholar

[3] Gunasekaran, R. Mc Neil, R. McGaughey and T. Ajasa, Experiences of a small to medium size enterprise in the design and implementation of manufacturing cells. International Journal computer integrated manufacturing 14 (2001) 212-223.

DOI: 10.1080/09511920150216332

Google Scholar

[4] J. Miltenburg, J. Wijngaard, The U-line balancing problem, Management Science 40 (10) (1994) 1378–1388.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1378

Google Scholar

[5] N. Marmaras, G. Poulakakis, and V. Papakostopoulos. Ergonomic design in ancient Greece. Applied Ergonomics, 30 (4) (1999) 361-368.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(98)00050-7

Google Scholar

[6] C. Wickens, J. Hollands. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Prentice Hall, second ed, New Jersey, (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] K. Oh, Expert Line Balancing System (ELBS), Computer& Industry Engineering, 33(1997) 303-306.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(97)00098-3

Google Scholar

[8] L. Pigage, J. Tucker, Motion and time study, Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations Bulletin, University of Illinois, Illinois 6 (1954) 24.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Zandin, Industrial Engineering Handbook, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] W.P. Helgeson, D.P. Birnie" Assembly Line Balancing Using the Ranked Positional Weight Technique", Journal of Industrial Engineering 12 (1961).

Google Scholar

[11] C. Becker, A. Scholl. A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing, European Journal of Operations Research (2004).

Google Scholar

[12] E. Falkenauer `A Grouping Genetic Algorithm for Line Balancing with Resource Dependent Task Times', Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP'97), University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, November 24-28. (1997).

Google Scholar

[13] G.J. Miltenburg , J. Wijngaard The U-Line Balancing Problem, Management Science 40 (10) (1994) 1378-1388.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1378

Google Scholar