Predicting Surface Roughness with Respect to Process Parameters Using Regression Analysis Models in End Milling

Article Preview

Abstract:

Surface roughness affects the functional attributes of finished parts. Therefore, predicting the finish surface is important to select the cutting levels in order to reach the required quality. In this research an experimental investigation was conducted to predict the surface roughness in the finish end milling process with higher cutting speed. Twenty sets of data for finish end milling on AISI H13 at hardness of 48 HRC have been collected based on five-level of Central Composite Design (CCD). All the experiments done by using indexable tool holder Sandvick Coromill R490 and the insert was PVD coated TiAlN carbide. The experimental work performed to predict four different roughness parameters; arithmetic mean roughness (Ra), total roughness (Rt), mean depth of roughness (Rz) and the root mean square (Rq).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

99-102

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. H AlHazza and Adesta E. Y. T, New Approach in Cost Structuring Of High Speed Hard Turning. Advanced Materials Research Vols. 264-265(2011) pp.1003-1008.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.264-265.1003

Google Scholar

[2] I. P. Arbizu, and C. J. L. Perez, Surface roughness prediction by factorial design of experiments in turning processes. J. Materials Processing Technology, 143-144(2003), 390−396.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00407-2

Google Scholar

[3] A. M. Ali, E Y.T. Adesta, D. Agusman, S.N.M. Badari and M. AlHazza, Development of Surface Roughness Prediction Model for High Speed End Milling of Hardened Tool Steel. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 4 (2011) 255-263.

DOI: 10.3923/ajsr.2011.255.263

Google Scholar

[4] K. Hashmi, M. A El Baradie, & M. Ryan, Fuzzy logic based intelligent selection of machining parameters. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 35, No. (3-4), (1998) 571-574.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(98)00161-2

Google Scholar

[5] U. Zuperl, and F. Cus, Optimization of cutting conditions during cutting by using neural networks, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 19 (2003) 189–199.

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-5845(02)00079-0

Google Scholar

[6] I. Asilturk, and M. Çunkaş, Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in turning operations using artificial neural network and multiple regression method. Expert Systems with Applications 38: (2011)5826–5832.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.041

Google Scholar

[7] T. Childs, K. Maekawa, T. Obikawa, and Y. Yamane, , Metal Machining Theory and Applications, John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York-Toronto (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] ISO 4287 (1998) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: profile method—Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. British Standards Institute, London.

DOI: 10.3403/30398213

Google Scholar

[9] ISO 4288 (1996) Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: profile method—Rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture. British Standards Institute, London.

DOI: 10.3403/02337030

Google Scholar