The Relationship between Contact Angle Difference and Equivalent Conicity of High-Speed EMU

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper studied the relationship among the linear model of wheel/rail characteristic parameters, the contact angle difference, the equivalent conicity and roll angle. The standard and worn profiles of S1002CN, XP55 and LMA were matched with 60 kg/m rail separately. The results of the study show that the ratio of contact angle difference to equivalent conicity changes linearly along lateral wheelset displacement within 5mm. Taking rolling angle into consideration, the contact angle difference and equivalent conicity in nominal position (3mm) display a linear relationship. Just considering the contact angle difference and roll angle in the fitting formula for the wheel/rail linear model calculation, the quasi-linear calculation of the critical speed could be more accurate. Therefore, the wheel/rail linear model characteristic parameters roll angle and the contact angle difference in the nominal position have certain effect on vehicle dynamic performance like equivalent conicity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 591-593)

Pages:

1920-1924

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] EN14363 Railway applications–Testing for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles–Testing of running behavior and stationary tests. CEN, Brussels, 2005. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.3403/30077264

Google Scholar

[2] UIC Code 518: Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behavior Safety–Track fatigue–Ride quality. International Union of Railways, 3rd ed., Paris, October 2005. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] C.G. Wang, F.Y. Wang, T.H. Li and L. Lan: Comparative Analysis on High-speed Wheel/Rail Contact Geometric, Rail way Locomotive Car, Vol. 26(2006) No 4, p.1.

Google Scholar

[4] Mauer, L, J. Kisilowski, K. Knothe and (Eds):, The modular description of the wheel to rail contact within the linear multibody formalism, Advanced Railway Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 26(1991), p.205.

Google Scholar

[5] O. POLACH: Comparability of the non-linear and linearized stability assessment during railway vehicle design, Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 44 (2006), p.129.

DOI: 10.1080/00423110600869537

Google Scholar

[6] S.L. Liang, M.W. Piao, J.H. Hao and W.Z. Zhao: Study on stability of the High-Speed bogie on three typical wheel treads, China Railway Science, Vol. 31 (2010) No 3, p.57. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Z.S. Chen: Railway Vehicle Dynamics And Control(China Railway Publishing House, China 2004). (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] M.W. Piao, L.J. F, S.L. Liang and W.Z. Zhao: Vehicle Lateral Stability Analysis Based on Wheel/rail Match, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 44 (2008) No 3, p.22. (In Chinese).

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2008.03.022

Google Scholar

[9] A.H. Wickens: Fundamentals Of Rail Vehicle Dynamics(Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse 2003).

Google Scholar