Optimal Sensor Configuration for Bridge Structures Following a Probabilistic Approach

Abstract:

In this paper, a statistical methodology is introduced for identifying the most effective way to install a limited number of sensors on a typical distributed-parameter system, i.e., a three-span continuous bridge model with two elastic supports to extract as much information as possible. This is performed by minimizing the uncertainties associated with the identified bridge modeling parameters. In the proposed methodology, the information entropy is employed as a measure to quantify the uncertainty of the identified structural modeling parameters. The problem of optimal sensor placement is then formulated as a continuous optimization problem, in which the information entropy is minimized, with the sensor configurations as the minimization variables. The generally used discrete-coordinate systems modeled by the finite element (FE) method can only approximate their actual dynamic behavior, which would in turn influence the sensor configuration results, and the sensors are confined to be only put on discrete nodes related to the coarse mesh scheme usually employed. For structures such as bridges belonging to typical distributed-parameter systems, it’s more reasonable and convenient to be modeled as continues-coordinate system with analytical formulation. It’s the main purpose of this paper to develop a sensor placement method for continues-coordinate systems following the Bayesian theorem and the information entropy method, with the binary-encoded genetic algorithm (GA) employed as the optimization technique.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 594-597)
• Pages: 1098-1104
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.594-597.1098
• Online since: November 2012
• Authors: Tao Yin, Hong Ping Zhu, Dian Qing Li
• Keywords: Bridge Structures, Genetic Algorithm (GA), Information Entropy, Optimal Sensor Placement, Structural Model Updating

References

[1] P. Shad, F.E. Udwadia, A methodology for optimal sensor locations for identification of dynamic systems, J. Appl. Mech.-T. ASME 45 (1978) 188-196.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3424225

[2] D. Kammer, Sensor placements for on orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures, J. Guid. Control Dynam. 14 (1991) 251-259.

DOI: 10.2514/3.20635

[3] F.E. Udwadia, Methodology for optimal sensor locations for parameters identification in dynamic systems, J. Eng. Mech.-ASCE 120 (1994) 368-390.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1994)120:2(368)

[4] J.E.T. Penny, M.I. Friswell, S.D. Garvey, Automatic choice of measurement location for dynamic testing, AIAA J. 32 (1994) 407-414.

DOI: 10.2514/3.11998

[5] C. Papadimitriou, J.L. Beck, S.K. Au, Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating, J. Vib. Control, 6 (2000) 781-800.

DOI: 10.1177/107754630000600508

[6] E.T. Jaynes: Where do we stand on maximum entropy? The Maximum Entropy Formalism, Levine, R.D., and Tribus, M. eds. Cambridge: MIT Press. (1978)

[7] H.M. Chow, H.F. Lam, T. Yin, S.K. Au, Optimal sensor configuration of a typical transmission tower for the purpose of structural model updating, Struct. Control. Hlth. 18 (2011) 305-320.

DOI: 10.1002/stc.372

[8] J.L. Beck, L.S. Katafygiotis, Updating models and their uncertainties – Bayesian statistical framework, J. Eng. Mech.-ASCE 124 (1998) 455-461.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455)

[9] N. Bleistein, R. Handelsman: Asymptotic Expansions for Integrals (Dover Publications, New York, 1986)

[10] C. Papadimitriou. Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems, J. Sound Vib. 278 (2004) 923-947.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.10.063