The Comparison of Three Recycling Processes of Copper Chromite Spent Catalysts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three technologies of recycling copper chromite spent catalysts from furfuryl production by furfural hydrogenization were developed. After the organic species was removed from the solid waste by vacuum pressure distillation at 130°C, the resultant solid waste catalyst was mixed with soda ash, followed by roasting, leaching and removing silicon in a reverberating furnace to obtain sodium chromate. Dissolving the cupric oxide in soda ash solution to remove chrome and then dissolving it in nitric acid, cupric nitrate can be obtained. A certain proportion of such sodium chromate and cupric nitrate were mixed and treated by ammonia solution to give precipitate, which was roasted and granulated to get new catalyst used in furfuryl production. Three processes features and their respective advantages and disadvantages were discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

566-569

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H.Adkins,R.Conner. Journal of the American Chemical Society,Vol.44(1931), p.109

Google Scholar

[2] Chengzhen Jiang,Shaofeng Gao,Zhaozheng Li.China PatentCN101,353,335(2009)

Google Scholar

[3] Haizeng Wang, Zengxin Li. Renewable resources, Vol.6(2002), pp.29-31

Google Scholar

[4] E. Furimsky.Catalysis Today ,Vol.30(1996), pp.223-286

Google Scholar

[5] Kaixi Zhu.Shanxi Chemical Industry, Vol.1(1992), pp.8-10

Google Scholar

[6] Jing Wu,Yan-ming Shen, Chang-hou Liu, Modern Chemical Industry, Vol.23(S1)(2002), pp.23-25

Google Scholar

[7] Zengxin Li, Qijun Zhang, Haizeng Wang. Chemistry World, Vol.39 (5) (1998),pp.268-271

Google Scholar

[8] Zengxin Li, Tong Wang,Huiluan Liu. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control,Vol.6 (1) (2005),pp.25-27

Google Scholar

[9] Zengxin Li, Donghui Chen. Modern Chemical Industry, Vol.24(8)(2002), pp.35-38

Google Scholar