Nearest Neighbor Search for Diagnosing Rain/Non-Rain Discrimination

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study examines the rain occurrence by the passive microwave imagery during typhoons. The dataset consists of 53 typhoons affecting the watershed over 2001-2008. This study employs nearest neighbor search (NNS) classifier which is often used for diagnosing forecast problems. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) and logistic regressions (LR) are selected as the benchmarks. The results show that for the rain/non-rain discrimination, the best performing classifier is NNS according to the AUC measures. The results show that the use of NNS can effectively improve the AUC measures for diagnosing rain occurrence. Overall, the use of NNS is a relatively effective algorithm comparing to other classifiers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

664-668

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P.A. Arkin, P.E. Ardanuy, Estimating climatic-scale precipitation from space, Journal of Climate 2 (1989), 1229-1238.

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<1229:ecspfs>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[2] R.R. Ferraro, F. Weng, N.C. Grody and A. Basist, An eight-year (1987-1994) time series of rainfall, clouds, water vapor, snow cover, and sea ice derived from SSM/I measurements, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 77 (1996), 891-905.

DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0891:aeytso>2.0.co;2

Google Scholar

[3] G.W. Petty, W.F. Krajewski, Satellite estimation of precipitation over land, Hydrological Sciences Journal 41 (1996), 433-451.

DOI: 10.1080/02626669609491519

Google Scholar

[4] R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, D.G. Stork, Pattern Classification, second ed., A Wiley-interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

Google Scholar

[5] D.M. Mount, N.S. Netanyahu, R. Silverman, A.Y. Wu, Chromatic nearest neighbor searching: A query sensitive approach, Computational Geometry 17 (2000), 97-119.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7721(00)00021-3

Google Scholar

[6] P. Viswanath, M.N. Murty, S. Bhatnagar, Fusion of multiple approximate nearest neighbor classifiers for fast and efficient classification, Information Fusion 5 (2004), 239-250.

DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.02.003

Google Scholar

[7] Y.S. Chen, Y.P. Hung, T.F. Yen, C.S. Fuh, Fast and versatile algorithm for nearest neighbor search based on a lower bound tree, Pattern Recognition 40 (2007), 360-375.

DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.08.016

Google Scholar

[8] A.O. Finley, R.E. McRoberts, Efficient k-nearest neighbor searches for multi-source forest attribute mapping, Remote Sensing of Environment 112 (2008), 2203-2211.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.08.024

Google Scholar

[9] Y.C. Liaw, C.M. Wu, M.L. Leou, Fast k-nearest neighbors search using modified principal axis search tree, Digital Signal Processing 20 (2010), 1494-1501.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2010.01.009

Google Scholar

[10] C.C. Wei, N.S. Hsu, Optimal tree-based release rules for real-time flood control operations on a multipurpose multireservoir system, Journal of Hydrology 365 (2009), 213-224.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.038

Google Scholar

[11] C.C. Wei, Wavelet kernel support vector machines forecasting techniques: Case study on water-level predictions during typhoons, Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012), 5189-5199.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.020

Google Scholar

[12] Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning/, 2012.

Google Scholar

[13] R. Weber, H.J. Schek, S. Blott, A Quantitative Analysis and Performance Study for Similarity Search Methods in High Dimensional Spaces. Very Large Databases (VLDB), New York, 1998.

Google Scholar

[14] A.N. Papadopoulos, Y. Manolopoulos, Nearest Neighbor Search: A Database Perspective. Springer, 2005.

Google Scholar

[15] T.A. Lasko, J.G. Bhagwat, K.H. Zou, L. Ohno-Machado, The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics, Journal of Biomedical Informatics 38 (2005), 404-415.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.008

Google Scholar

[16] G. Vanagas, Receiver operating characteristic curves and comparison of cardiac surgery risk stratification systems, Interactive CardioVasc Thoracic Surgery 3 (2004), 319-322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icvts.2004.01.008

Google Scholar

[17] J.A. Swets, Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: Collected papers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.

DOI: 10.1177/0272989x9901900216

Google Scholar

[18] M. Greiner, D. Pfeiffer, R.D. Smith, Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 45 (2000), 23-41.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00115-x

Google Scholar

[19] J.A. Swets, Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems, Science 240 (1988), 1285-1293.

DOI: 10.1126/science.3287615

Google Scholar