Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Offshore Drill Cuttings Management Options

Article Preview

Abstract:

The disposal of the drill cuttings is a complex environmental problem. In the paper, two offshore drill cuttings management options are evaluated using life cycle inventory analysis, namely offshore reinjection and onshore solidification. Environmental burdens of the two management options are calculated. Results indicated that: a) From the life cycle perspective, treating 1 m3 drill cuttings, onshore solidification generate more CO2, CO, NOx, COD, TOC and Ammonia nitrogen than reinjection. On the contrary, reinjection generate more PM 2.5, PM10, SOx, Nitrate, and SS than solidification. Which option has less environmental impact needs further assessment. b) Selecting an environment-friendly curing agent is necessary for solidification process to reduce CO2 emissions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

1117-1120

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Garcia, M. Kapila, Calculation of energy requirements and air emissions for drill cuttings management, 13th Annual International Petroleum Environmental Conference. 2006. Available at http: /ipec. utulsa. edu/Conf2006/2006agenda. html.

Google Scholar

[2] J.E. Paulsen, B. Jensen, J. Petersen and T. Svensen, A management technique that integrates and glues cost and environmental performance targets in E&P drilling, SPE Paper/AIDC 102004. (2006).

DOI: 10.2118/102004-ms

Google Scholar

[3] J.E. Paulsen, T.H. Omland, H. Igeltjorn, N. Aas and S.A. Solvang, Drill cuttings disposal, balancing zero discharge and use of best available technique. SPE/IADC Paper 85296. (2003).

DOI: 10.2118/85296-ms

Google Scholar

[4] J. Pettersen, Overall evaluation of offshore drilling fluid technology: development and application of life cycle inventory and impact assessment methods. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), Offshore waste management review. Alberta, Canada. 2001, p.172.

Google Scholar

[6] Information on: http: /www. itke. com. cn.

Google Scholar

[7] D.A. Silvio, M. Fawer, R. Fritschi and C. Allenspach, Life cycle inventories for the production of detergent ingredients, EMPA report No. 244, St. Gallen, (1999).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02979499

Google Scholar

[8] M. Fawer, M. Concannon and W. Rieber: Life cycle inventories for the production of sodium silicates, Int. J. LCA. 4(1999) 207-212.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02979498

Google Scholar

[9] J.A. He, Solidification treatment of drilling cutting and mud and relevant environmental impact assessment, Environ. Prot. Oil & Gas Fields. 12(2002) 37-40. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Kellenberger, H.J. Althaus, T. Kunniger, M. Lehmann, N. Jungbluth and P Thalmann, Life cycle inventories of building products, Ecoinvent report No. 7, (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] F. Gao, X.H. Zhao, T. He and Y.F. Li, Study on performance control and rheological property of the re-injection slurry, Drilling & Prod. Tech. 34(2011) 101-103. In Chinese.

Google Scholar