Rapid and Sensitive Competitive Fluorescence Immunoassay for the Detection of Chlortetracycline Residues in Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

An direct competitive immunofluorescence method was developed in plate to detect chlortetracycline residues in environment using the Lumichrome as fluorescent probe. Different reaction conditions such as pH , the concentration of antigen and antibody and incubation times were assayed. Under optimized conditions, chlortetracycline can be determined in the concentration range of 1×10-8--2×10-4 mol/L, and the linear equation was y=11.363x+93.026, R2=0.99. The detection limit of this method IC90 was 3.74×10-7mol/L. The recoveries of chlortetracycline at various spiking levels in the sludge samples ranged from 95.43% to 104.26%, with relative standard deviations of 3% to 6%. These data demonstrate that the excellent performance of the proposed method in the detection of chlortetracycline in water samples.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

1166-1169

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rigos G, Troisi GM (2005) Rev Fish Biol Fisher 15:53–73

Google Scholar

[2] Sarmah AK, Meyer MT, Boxall ABA (2006) Chemosphere 65:725–729

Google Scholar

[3] Ramirez AJ, Mottaleb MA, Brooks BW, Chambliss CK(2007) Anal Chem 79:3155–3163

Google Scholar

[4] Consuelo Cháfer-Pericás, Ángel Maquieira, Rosa Puchades(2010) Anal Bioanal Chem 396: 911–921

DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-3229-3

Google Scholar

[5] Markus Himmelsbach and Wolfgang Buchberger , Microchim Acta (2005)151: 67–72

Google Scholar

[6] Romero R, López JC, Gómez E, Garrido A, Martínez JL (2007) J Chromatogr B 857:142–148

Google Scholar

[7] Huet, A., Charlier, C., Tittlemier, S. A., Singh, G., Benrejeb (2006). J Agricul Food Chem. 54, 2822-2827.

Google Scholar

[8] Kilinc, B., & Cakli, S. (2008) Eur. Food Res. Technol 226: 795-799.

Google Scholar