Control of Hg0 Re-Emission from Simulated Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Liquors by Sodium Dithiocarbamate

Article Preview

Abstract:

Secondary atmospheric pollutions may result from wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) systems caused by the reduction of Hg2+ to Hg0 and lead to a damping of the co-benefit mercury removal efficiency by WFGD systems. The effects of the operating conditions, which included the pH, temperature, and oxygen concentrations, on Hg0 re-emission inhibition efficiency by DTCR from WFGD liquors was carried out. The established data reflected an outstanding performance on the Hg0 re-emission inhibition from the simulated WFGD liquors by adding DTCR. Our data suggested that a concentration of 0.0005% (v/v) was enough for Hg0 re-emission inhibition in the simulated WFGD liquors. The results also indicated that the Hg0 re-emission inhibition efficiency by adding DTCR decreased as the operational temperatures increased and the Hg0 re-emission inhibition efficiency increased as pH values and the oxygen concentration in the flue gas increased. The present findings could be valuable for industrial application of DTCR as a precipitant for stabilizing dissolved Hg2+ to prevent re-emission of Hg0 in WFGD solutions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

1473-1477

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Srivastava R K, Hutson N, Martin B, et al. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2006, 40(5): 1385-1393.

Google Scholar

[2] Pavlish J H, Sondreal E A, Mann M D, et al. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 82(2-3): 89-165.

Google Scholar

[3] Diaz-somoano M, Unterberger S, Hein K R, et al. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(3): 259-263.

Google Scholar

[4] Tan Z, Sun L, Xiang J, et al. Carbon, 2012, 50(2): 362-371.

Google Scholar

[5] L A M, Abad-valle P, D S M, et al. Fuel, 2009, 88(7): 1194-1200.

Google Scholar

[6] Li H, Wu C Y, Li Y, et al. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 111-112: 381-388.

Google Scholar

[7] Granite E J, Pennline H W. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(22): 5470-5476.

Google Scholar

[8] Omine N, Romero C E, Kikkawa H, et al. Fuel, 2012, 91(1): 93-101.

Google Scholar

[9] Wo J, Zhang M, Cheng X, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 172(2-3): 1106-1110.

Google Scholar

[10] Chang J C, Ghorishi S B. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2003, 37(24): 5763-5766.

Google Scholar

[11] Tang T, Xu J, Lu R, et al. Fuel, 2010, 89(12): 3613-3617.

Google Scholar

[12] Lu R, Hou J, Xu J, et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 196(0): 160-165.

Google Scholar

[13] Ochoa-gonz R, D S M, Rosa M T, et al. Fuel, 2012, in press.

Google Scholar

[14] Sun M, Hou J, Tang T, et al. Fuel Processing Technology, 2012, in press.

Google Scholar