Study on the Synergistic Effect of the Measures for Air Pollution Reduction

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is a trend to reduce multiple pollutant emissions simultaneously by one kind of reduction policies or measures, as the pollution control and emission reduction are in a grim situation in China. And the synergistic effect research of the reduction measures is the basis which can help make the correct measures. The paper first shows the definition of the synergistic effect, then, elaborates the relationship between the reduction measures and the synergistic effect. Besides, the development and the evaluation methods of the reduction measures are also illustrated. Finally, some reasonable suggestions on research of the synergistic effect are given.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

1628-1633

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Liping Li, Guomei Zhou. Don't ignore the co-benefit effect of the pollution reduction [J]. Environmental Protection, 2009, 24: 36-38.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhifang Wang. The synergistic effect of reducing dioxin discharge in paper industry [J].China pulp & paper industry, 2011, 32(3): 13-15.

Google Scholar

[3] Huiping Dong. The energy structure adjustment and optimization of China[J]. Journal of Longdong University, 2011, 22(4): 37-40.

Google Scholar

[4] Bowen Wang, Nan Zhou, Zhiwei Zhang. China's energy structure development trend analysis [J]. Business Culture, 2008, 5: 63.

Google Scholar

[5] Renfei,Pan Chen Liuqin. Energy structure change and the realization of the carbon reduction goals in China[J]. Development Research, 2011, 9: 85-88.

Google Scholar

[6] Zhihua Wang. Mechanism study on multi-pollution control simultaneously during coal combustion and direct numerical simulation of reaction jets flow[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2005.

Google Scholar

[7] Petra Mayerhofer, Bert de Vries, Michel den Elzen, etc. Long-term, consistent scenarios of emissions, deposition, and climate change in Europe[J]. Environmental science and policy, 2002,5(4): 273-305.

DOI: 10.1016/s1462-9011(02)00038-2

Google Scholar

[8] Jinnan Wang, Miao Ning, Gang Yan, etc.Implementing climate-friendly strategy for air pollution prevention and control [J].China soft science, 2010, 10: 28-36.

Google Scholar

[9] Min Zhang, Jun Chen.Control and development situation of nitrogen oxide at domestic coal-fired power plant [J].Sichuan chemical industry, 2009, 12(5): 44-52.

Google Scholar

[10] Terje Berntsen, Jan Fuglestvedt, Gunnar Myhre, etc. Abatement of greenhouse gases: Does location matter?[J] Climatic Change, 2006, 74 (4): 377–411.

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-006-0433-4

Google Scholar

[11] G.Boer, B. Yu. Climate sensitivity and response[J]. Climatic Dynamics, 2003, 20(4): 415–429.

Google Scholar

[12] Tollefsen P, Rypdal K, Torvanger A, et al. Air pollution policies in Europe: efficiency gains from integrating climate effects with damage costs to health and crops[J]. Environmental science and policy, 2009,12: 870-881.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.006

Google Scholar

[13] Tao Hu, Chunxiu Tian, Liping Li. Influence of co-benefit on policy in China[J]. Environmental protection, 2004, 9: 56-58.

Google Scholar

[14] Sanna, Syri, Markus Amann, Pantelis Capros, etc. Low-CO2 energy parhways and regional air pollution in Europe[J]. Energy policy, 2001, 29: 871-884.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00022-2

Google Scholar

[15] Chris Heyes, Wolfgang Schopp, Markus Amann, etc. A reduced-form model to predict long-term ozone concentrations in Europe[M]. Austria, international institute for applied systems analysis, 1997.

Google Scholar

[16] M.L. Williams. UK air quality in 2050-synergies with climate change policies[J]. Environmental science and policy, 2007, 10: 169-175.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.11.001

Google Scholar

[17] Syri, S., Amann, M,. Capros, P,. etc. Low-CO2 energy parthways and regional air pollution in Europe[J]. Energy policy, 2001, 29: 871-884.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00022-2

Google Scholar

[18] Van Vuuren, D.P. Cofala, J,Eerens, etc. Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe[J]. Energy policy, 2006, 34: 444-460.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.012

Google Scholar

[19] Yeora Chae. Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area[J]. Environmental science and policy, 2010,13: 205-216.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.003

Google Scholar

[20] Chunxiu Tian, Liping Li, Hongwei Yang, etc. The environmental co-benefits of the West-East of Natural Gas Pipeline Project [J].Research of environmental science, 2006, 19(3): 122-127.

Google Scholar

[21] Chunxiu Tian, Liping Li, Tao Hu, etc. Synergistic effects of climate change and environmental policy[J]. Environmental protection, 2009, 12: 67-68.

Google Scholar

[22] Wolfgang Schopp, Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, etc. Integrated assessment of European air pollution emission control strategies[J]. Environmental modeling and software, 1999, 14: 1-9.

DOI: 10.1016/s1364-8152(98)00034-6

Google Scholar

[23] Kristin Rypdal, Nathan Rive, Stefan Astrom, etc. Nordic air quality co-benefits from European post-2012 climate policies[J]. Energy policy, 2007, 35: 6309-6322.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.022

Google Scholar

[24] Markus Amann, Martin Lutz. The revision of the air quality legislation in the European Union related to ground-level ozone[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2000, 78:41-62.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00216-8

Google Scholar

[25] Wolfgang Schopp, Zbigniew Klimont, Riku Suutari, etc. Uncertainty analysis of emission estimates in the RAINS integrated assessment model[J]. Ecologic economics, 2001,39: 257-270.

Google Scholar

[26] Shuping Ma. RAINS model and its application in the cost estimation of PM[M]. China Xinjiang:China Environmental Science Society Annual Conference, 2011.

Google Scholar

[27] Gielen D, Chen Changhong. The CO2 emission reduction benefits of Chinese energy policies and environmental policies: a case study for Shanghai, period 1995-2020[J]. Ecologic economics, 2001,39: 257-270.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00206-3

Google Scholar

[28] Qing Tong, Quan Bai, Bin Liu, etc. Application of MARKAL model for study on Beijing's Energy Development in Mid-& Long term[J]. Energy of China, 2004, 26(6): 36-40.

Google Scholar

[29] Zhaoyong Liu, Xiangsheng Wu, Antian Liu. Building energy conservation with MARKAL model[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2002, 25(8): 111-113.

Google Scholar

[30] Liping Li, Guomei Zhou, Haoyu Ji. Study of co-benefits assessment of pollution reduction: a case study in Panzhihua[J]. China population, resource and environment, 2010, 20(5): 91-95.

Google Scholar

[31] Xianqiang Mao, An Zeng, Tao Hu, etc. Study of coordinate control effect assessment of technological measures for emissions reduction[J]. China population, resource and environment, 2011, 21(12): 1-7.

Google Scholar

[32] Rong He, Peihong Yin, Ning Yang. Collaborative emission reduction in the field of waste is the Important way to achieve greenhouse gas emission reduction [J].Chinese journal of environmental management, 2011, 4:33-36.

Google Scholar

[33] Rong He, Peihong Yin. Whether the western waste pollution reduction policies could be used in the eastern regions[J]. Environmental protection, 2011, 18: 68-70.

Google Scholar