Research on the Removal Results of Hydrogen Sulfide of the Treatment of Coal Gasification Wastewater Biogas in the Anaerobic Biotrickling Filter

Article Preview

Abstract:

The uncertainty of operating parameters hinders the practical application of the biological desulfurization. To solve this problem, this study which was conducted in room temperature, pH around seven conditions, investigated the effects of the operating parameters on the hydrogen sulfide (H2S) removal performance in the biotrickling filter, including inlet H2S concentration, inlet flow rate or gas retention time, inlet volume load and circulating liquid spraying flux. The results showed that, the inlet H2S concentration should be controlled within 800mg/m3, 650mg/m3, 400mg/m3, 300mg/m3 respectively while the inlet flow rate was 150L/h, 200L/h, 250L/h, 300L/h, at those conditions, the outlet H2S concentrations were lower than 8mg/m3 and the H2S removal efficiencies were more than 98%. The optimum gas retention time was 12.37s, corresponding to the inlet flow rate of 200L/h, at this time, even if the inlet H2S concentration as high as 700mg/m3, the removal efficiency could be still more than 98%, the outlet concentration of H2S was only 13.1mg/m3. The maximum inlet volume load was 130g/(m3•h), in this condition, the outlet concentration of H2S could be controlled below 12mg/m3, the removal efficiency could above 98.4%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

2000-2005

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Chou S, Mike F, Sam K, Lisa I, Lara C. Toxicological Profile for H2S. Atlanta: US Public Health Services Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2006.

Google Scholar

[2] Chi Y Z, Li Y X. Journal of Tianjin Urban Construction Institute, 2001, 7(2): 105-108.

Google Scholar

[3] Strevett K A, Vieth R F, Grasso D. Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal, 1995, 58(1): 71-79.

Google Scholar

[4] Truong L V A, Abatzoglou N. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 29(2): 142-151.

Google Scholar

[5] Li K Z, Zhang R, Bi J C. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 35(7): 2722–2726.

Google Scholar

[6] GB 17820-1999, Natural Gas.

Google Scholar

[7] Maat H T, Hogendoorn J A, Versteeg G F. Separation and Purification Technology, 2005,43(3): 183-197.

Google Scholar

[8] Cox H H J, Deshusses M A. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2002, 87(1):101-110.

Google Scholar

[9] Sercu B, Nunez D, Langenhove V H, Aroca G, Verstraete W. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2005, 90(2):259-269.

Google Scholar

[10] Goncalves J J, Govind R. Chemosphere, 2008, 73(9):1478-1483.

Google Scholar