Effects of Soil Amendment on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Oat Field

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of different soil amendment (potassium polyacrylate; polyacrylamide;potassium humate; potassium polyacrylate+ potassium humate; polyacrylamide+ potassium humate) on soil physical and chemical properties in oat field was studied. The results showed that different soil amendments increase significantly the soil organic matter, available N, available P and available K content by 8.24%-30.22%, 7.60%-19.29%, 5.15%-29.45% and 27.86%-68.86% respectively. Soil water content at 0-60 cm depth is higher with soil amendment. But soil amendment has no effect on the soil water content at 60-100 cm soil depth. At the same time, soil amendments reduce the soil bulk density at 0-10 cm,10-20 cm, 20-40 cm and 40-60 cm depths, and they produce no obvious effect on soil bulk density at 60-100 cm depth. The proportion of > 0.25 mm soil aggregate at 0-10 cm,10-20 cm and 20-40 cm depth is increased significantly by applying soil amendment. Among five aggregate sizes (> 2 mm; 2-1 mm; 1-0.5 mm; 0.5-0.25 mm; 2 mm and 2-1 mm soil aggregates are the most. In conclusion, the mixing use of two kinds of soil amendments(potassium polyacrylate+ potassium humate and polyacrylamide+ potassium humate) is more effective for improving soil physical and chemical properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

2937-2943

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.R. Islam, A.E. Eneji, C.Z. Ren, J.M. Li and Y.G. Hu: Scientific Research and Essays. Vol. 6 (2011), pp.720-728.

Google Scholar

[2] M.R. Islam, A.M.S. Alam, A.E. Eneji, C.Z. Ren, W.J. Song and Y.G. Hu: Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment. Vol. 9 (2011), pp.514-518.

Google Scholar

[3] Changrong Yan, Hui Ju, Shiqi Peng and Xiaochuan Yu: Transactions of the CSAE. Vol. 18 (2002), pp.11-14(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Yiqun Chen and Yuanhua Dong: Ecology and Environment. Vol. 17 (2008), pp.1282-1289(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] R.D. Lentz and R.E. Sojka: Soil Science. Vol. 158 (1994), pp.274-282.

Google Scholar

[6] Yucui Shao and Yulang Zhang: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 19 (2005), pp.100-103(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] R.B. Brayn: Soil Technology. Vol. 5 (1992), pp.225-247.

Google Scholar

[8] R.E. Sojka, R.D. Lentz, C.W. Ross, T.J. Trout, D.L. Bjorneberg and J.K. Aase: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 53 (1999), pp.325-331.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Daniel: Soil Seienee. Vol. 15 (1991), pp.151-153.

Google Scholar

[10] R.D. Lentz, R.E. Sojka and C.W. Robbins: Advances in GeoEcology. Vol. 31 (1998), pp.1233-1238.

Google Scholar

[11] M.I. Choudhary, A.A. Shalaby and A.M. Alomran: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. Vol. 26 (1995), pp.2205-2215.

Google Scholar

[12] W.J. Busscher, J.M. Novak and T.C. Caesar-TonThat: Soil and Tillage Research. Vol. 93 (2007), pp.171-178.

DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.03.023

Google Scholar

[13] Institute of Soil Science of Chinese Academy of Science: Soil Chemical and Physical Analysis (Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai 1981) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Institute of Soil Science, CAS: The determination method of soil physical propertie (Science Press, Beijing 1978) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Lin Huo, Tianyun Wu, Haimin Lin, Sshiyu Cao and Wenxue Tang: Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. Vol. 9 (2008), pp.545-550(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] Bosheng Luo, Jihong Zhong and Junjian Chen: Soils. Vol. 36 (2004), pp.104-106(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] A. Huttermann, M. Zommorodia and K. Reise: Soil and Tillage Research. Vol. 50 (1999), pp.295-304.

Google Scholar

[18] Deshui Wang: Soil and Fertilizer. Vol. 5 (1990), pp.9-13(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[19] R.A.I. Azzam: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. Vol. 14 (1983), pp.739-760.

Google Scholar

[20] Hui Wang, Quanjiu Wang and Mingan Shao: Transactions of the CSAE. Vol. 24 (2008), pp.85-88(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[21] Huanqing Sun and Changqing Su: Northern Horticul Ture. Vol. 7 (2009), pp.100-101(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[22] Huilin Xu, Chuan Ye, Lingang Yang, Xiaobiao Xu, Zhongping Li, Xichu Yu and Huijuan Sun: Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin.Vol. 26 (2010), pp.255-258(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[23] Jun Liang, Chunlin Wu, Linsen Zhang, Lianrang Shi, Jian Sun, Yongfang Liu and Yaohui Jia: Acta AgriculturaeBoreali-Occidentalis Sinica. Vol. 8 (1999), pp.74-76(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[24] Aifen Lin. Effect of Different Humic Acid Levels on Soil Characteristic and Leaf Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco(MS., Henan Agricultural University, China 2008)

Google Scholar

[25] A. Wallace and A.M. Abouzamam: Soil Soc. Vol. 141 (1986), pp.343-345.

Google Scholar

[26] Hongwei Zhang, Mingjie Long and Fansen Zeng: Research of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 8 (2001), pp.115-118(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[27] Chao Gao, Xiaoxia Li, Chongfa Cai, Shuwen Ding and Chao Deng: Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University. Vol. 24 (2005), pp.355-358(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[28] Rongguo Sun, Wusi Wei, Ming Ma, Jiajia Li, Xiaojun Shi, Yutao Zhang and Dingyun Wang: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 25 (2011), pp.162-166(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[29] Y. Chen and M. SehnitZer: Soil Science Society of America Journal. Vol. 40 (1976), pp.682-686.

Google Scholar