Impact of Fertilization and Soil Phosphorus Status on Phosphorus Leaching from Soil in Vegetable Greenhouse

Article Preview

Abstract:

The vegetable utilization rate of phosphorus fertilizer in greenhouse condition was low in the season of fertilizer application, resulting in phosphorus accumulation in the top soil year after year. The risk of phosphorus loss through leaching increased under the circumstance of inappropriate watering management and fertilization. In this study, leaching experiments using columns packed with a greenhouse soil with different soil phosphorus status (low, medium and high levels) were carried out under greenhouse condition to investigate the impact of fertilizer application on phosphorus leaching from greenhouse soil. The fertilization treatments included no fertilizer [CK], organic manure and chemical fertilizer [M+NPK], organic manure [M], chemical fertilizer [NPK]. The vertical migration and leaching loss of soil phosphorus were measured. Results were as follows: (1) total phosphorus (TP) content increased with the extension of leaching time. In the low-level- and medium-level-phosphorus greenhouse soils, TP concentration in the effluent increased with the application of manure; (2) In the high-level-phosphorus greenhouse soil, phosphorus in the effluent from the treatment with the use of fertilizer was the highest TP, with accumulative leaching amount of 2.85 mg in 51 days. The leaching of phosphorus became small after 36 days of leaching experiment. Our study showed that application of manure and chemical fertilizer at proper rates according to soil phosphorus status is beneficial to reduce the leaching loss of phosphorus to the environment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

2968-2973

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X.T. Ju, C.L. Kou and P. Christie: Environ. Pollution Vol. 145(2007), pp.497-506

Google Scholar

[2] M.K. Zhang, L P. Wang: J. Agro Environ. Sci. Vol. 26 (2007), pp.282-285

Google Scholar

[3] J.L Lu, S. Fortune and P.C. Brookes: J. Agro-Environ. Sci Vol.22(2003), pp.142-146

Google Scholar

[4] X.Y. Yang, B.H. Sun, Q.Z. Gu: Acta Agric. Bor.-Occid. Sin Vol. 16(2007), pp.118-123

Google Scholar

[5] J.T. Sims, R.R. Simard, and B.C. Joern: J. Environ. Qual Vol. 27(1998a), pp.277-293

Google Scholar

[6] P.C. Jager, and A.S. Claassens: Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal Vol. 36(2005), pp.309-319

Google Scholar

[7] J.T. Sims, R.R. Simard and B.C. Joern: J. Environ. Qual Vol. 27(1998b), p.277–293.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Heckrath, P.C. Brookes, P.R. Poulton: J. Environ. Qual Vol. 24(1995), pp.904-910

Google Scholar

[9] O.F. Schoumans and P. Groenendijk: J. Environ. Qual.,29(2000), p.111–116.

Google Scholar

[10] C. Stamm, H. Fluhler, R. Gachter: Environ. Qual Vol. 27(1998), pp.515-522

Google Scholar

[11] H.M. van Es, R.R. Schindelbeck and W.E. Jokela: J. Environ. Qual Vol. 33 (2004), pp.1070-1080

Google Scholar