Effects of Five Kinds of Antibiotics on the Damage of Prorocentrum minimum

Heng Jiang Cai; Chang Fa Liu; Hai Feng Wei

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.610-613.3226

Paper Titles

Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Organic Agriculture
p.3206

Preliminary Discussion on the Modification of Ecological Footprint Model
p.3212

The Research on the Impact Factors of Low-Quality Stands Soil Respiration after Different Transformations in Greater Higgnan Mountains
p.3217

The Migration and Transformation of Pyrethroids in Coastal Sedimentary Environment
p.3222

Effects of Five Kinds of Antibiotics on the Damage of Prorocentrum minimum
p.3226

Changes in the Growth, Physiology and Biochemistry of Alexandrium tamarense under Ulva pertusa Kjellman Stress and UV-B Radiation
p.3231

Research on the Influence of Reclamation to the Marine Ecological Environment – Taking Lianyun New City Constructing as an Example
p.3236

The Problems of Wetlands in our Country and the Researches
p.3242

Study on Nano-TiO₂ Film Prepared by Hydrothermal Method in Toluene-Hydrochloric Acid-Water System
p.3247

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 610-613Effects of Five Kinds of Antibiotics on the Damage...

Effects of Five Kinds of Antibiotics on the Damage of Prorocentrum minimum

Abstract:

The use of bacteria for red tides control is a promising method, but the microalgae sterile is the basis of the research. The effects of Amipicillin, Gentamycin sulfate, Nomycin sulfate, Chcoramphencol, Kanamycin sulfate on the growth, Chl-a and MDA content of Prorocentrum minimum were studied under laboratory conditions. The results showed that Gentamycin sulfate and Kanamycin sulfate could stimulated the growth of P. minimum under lower concentrations (0.05mg/mL), and the growth stimulation was significant (pP. minimum under higher concentrations. The growth inhibition was significant (pP. minimum showed the significant difference in sensitivity to five kinds of antibiotics. The inhibition of Chcoramphencol was the largest, while Kanamycin sulfate was the smallest in the five kinds of antibiotics. The Chl-a content was decreased (p<0.05) by five kinds of antibiotics when the concentration was 2.00mg/mL. Besides, the accumulation of MDA content was observed by Chcoramphencol treatment. Therefore, Chcoramphencol could not be used for the microalgae sterile.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Progress in Environmental Science and Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

3226-3230

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.610-613.3226

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Heng Jiang Cai, Chang Fa Liu, Hai Feng Wei

Keywords:

Antibiotics, Damage, Growth, Prorocentrum minimum

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Z. B. Yang and I. J. Hodgkiss:Harmful Algae Vol.3(2004), p.149

Google Scholar

[2] L.H. Zhou, T. L. Zheng, X. Wang, J. L. Ye, Y. Tian and H.S. Hong:Harmful Algae Vol.6(2007), p.354

Google Scholar

[3] B. R. Patricai, J. T. Michael, M.M. Christina, B. B. Amanda and J. D. Gregory:Harmful Algae, Vol.7(2008), p.682

Google Scholar

[4] X. X. Ma, L. P. Ma, X. X. Shi and Y. L. Ma:Prog in Microbiol Immunol Vol.40(2012), p.83

Google Scholar

[5] R. R. L. Guillard:Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates(Plenum Press, New York 1975)

Google Scholar

[6] J. Sambrook, E. F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis:Molecular cloning 2ed(Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York 1992)

Google Scholar

[7] A. Jensen: Handbook of physiological methods(Cambridge University Press, New York 1978)

Google Scholar

[8] R. L. Heath and L. Packer:Arch Biochem Biophys Vol.125(1968), p.189

Google Scholar

[9] A. Al-Ahmad, F. D. Daschner and K. Kümmerer:Arch Envi-ron Contam Toxicol Vol.37(1999), p.158

Google Scholar

[10] M. Faust, R. Altenburger and T. Backhaus:Journal of Environmental Quality Vol.29(2000), p.1063

Google Scholar

[11] T. Backhaus, M. Scholze and L. H. Grimme: Aquatic Toxicology Vol.49(2000), p.49

Google Scholar

[12] A. R. Beaumont and P. B.Newman:Mar Pollut Bull Vol.17(1986), p.457

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Wang, Z. Yang, X. Tang, Y. Liu and Y. Li:Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae Vol.22(2002), p.225(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] A. R. D. Stebbing:Sci Tol Environ Vol.22(1982), p.213

Google Scholar

[15] K. R. Roger, F. Albert and J. Anderson:Plant Physiol Vol.86(1988), p.547

Google Scholar