Preliminary Experiment on Extraction of Eisenia foetida Coelomic Fluid with Water Bath Pot

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work explored a new water bath stimulating method to extract coelomic fluid from active Eisenia foetida. Coelomic fluid discharge amount and the coelomic fluid activity were tested to obtain the optimum extraction temperature (ET) and time. The maximum amount of coelomic fluid was obtained at 42 oC, at which vermis is exact activity, while the vermis activity is inhibited at 44 oC and even the vermis comprehensive death is observed at 46 oC, therefore the optimum ET is 42 oC; the optimum extraction time is 7 a.m. and 6 p.m for which the volume of coelomic fluid is the most. When extracted from coelomic fluid at 7 a.m and 11a.m, 60 times and 10 times diluted solution obtained the highest generation rate; when it is at 3 p.m., 10 and 100 dilution times is the best; when it is at 1 p.m., 30 and 200 dilution times is the best, and 30-80 dilution times is the optimal when it is from 3 p.m..

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

3566-3569

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.D. Pan, X.H. Liu, F. Ge and T. Zheng: Journal of Biochemistry, Vol. 28(2003) No.6, p.723.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Grdisa, M. Popović and T. Hraenjak: Cell Biochemistry and Function, Vol. 22(2004) No.6, p.373.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Ohta, S. Shioda, Y Sekizawa, Y. Nakai and H. Kobayashi: Cell and Tissue Research, Vol. 302(2000) No.2, p.263.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.Q. Liu, Y. Sun, Z.J. Sun, S.J. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Liao and Y.H. Gao: European Journal of Soil Biology, Vol. 43(2007) No.1, p.143.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Hendawi, S. Sauvé, M. Ashour, P. Brousseau, and M. Fournie: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Vol. 59 (2004) No.1, p.17.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Kobayashi,_M. Ohtomi, Y. Sekizawa and N. Ohta: Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, Vol. 128(2001) No.3, p.401.

DOI: 10.1016/s1532-0456(00)00213-1

Google Scholar

[7] E. Kauschke, W. Mohrig and E.L. Cooper: European Journal of Soil Biology, Vol. 43 (2007) No.S1, p.110.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Köhlerova, A. Beschin, M. Silerová, P. De Baetselier and M. Bilej: Developmental and Comparative Immunology, Vol. 28(2004) No.7-8, p.701.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Ueda, K. Noda, M. Nakazawa, K. Miyatake, S. Ohki, M. Sakaguchi and K. Inouye: Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vol. 151(2008) No.4, p.381.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.08.005

Google Scholar

[10] P. Engelmann, J. Kiss, V. Csöngei, E.L. Cooper and P. Németh: Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysical Methods, Vol. 61(2004) No.1-2, p.215.

Google Scholar

[11] C. Wang, Z.J. Sun, Y.Q. Liu, X.C. Zhang and G.Z. Xu: European Journal of Soil Biology, Vol. 43(2007) No.S1, p.127.

Google Scholar

[12] Homa.J, Bzowska M, Klimek M, et al.: Developmental and Comparative Immunology, Vol. 32(2008) No.1, p.9.

Google Scholar