Performance Comparison between Metal Honeycomb and Ceramic Honeycomb in Continuous Waste Heat Recovery

Ling Ren; Yu Hu; De Hong Xia

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.614-615.277

Paper Titles

Abnormal Heat by Thermal Changing in a D-Pd Gas-Loading System
p.253

Thermodynamic Analysis and Experimental Investigation of Internal Heat Exchanger Influence on CO₂ Trans-Critical Cycle Performance
p.259

The Numerical Simulation of the Shell Side Flow and Heat Transfer for 600MW Steam Turbine Condenser
p.265

Heat Transfer Investigation of the Circulating Fluidized Bed Evaporator for Concentrating Pineapple Juice
p.272

Performance Comparison between Metal Honeycomb and Ceramic Honeycomb in Continuous Waste Heat Recovery
p.277

Calculation Method of Attemperation Water Flow in Changing Steam Flow Condition
p.282

Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer in Shell and Tube Heat Storage Fixed Vertical Fins
p.286

Orthogonal Experimental Research on Sintering Cooler Transfer Performance
p.291

Numerical Simulation of the Liquid Flowing and Heat-Transfer outside the Tube of the Horizontal-Tube Falling Film Evaporator
p.296

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 614-615Performance Comparison between Metal Honeycomb and...

Performance Comparison between Metal Honeycomb and Ceramic Honeycomb in Continuous Waste Heat Recovery

Abstract:

Metal Honeycomb (MH) is a plug-in unit for heat transfer enhancement, which has a large specific surface adjustable range, high heat conductivity and excellent geometric plasticity. The continuous waste heat recovery processes are simulated by FLUENT with inserted MH and ceramic honeycomb(CH) at the same shape and dimension. By comparing the heat exchange of MH with CH, it is found that the heat recovery device with MH has better performance and smaller pressure loss than that with CH.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Power and Electrical Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 614-615)

Pages:

277-281

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.614-615.277

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Ling Ren, Yu Hu, De Hong Xia

Keywords:

Ceramic Honeycomb, Heat Exchanger, Metal Honeycomb, Waste Heat Recovery

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Z.P. Song and J. Shi: Industrial Furnace Vol. 26, No.6(2004), p.13.

Google Scholar

[2] D.H. Xia, G.S. Xue and W.Q. Ao: Energy for Metallurgical Industry Vol.27, No.5(2008), p.46.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Wang: Preparation of High-performance Composite Phase Change Material and Regenerative Combustion Technology (Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing 2006).

Google Scholar

[4] M.D. Li and H.E. Cheng: Journal of Thermal Science and Technology Vol.3, No.3(2004), p.255.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Anindya and D. Saritk: Int. J. Therm. Sci Vol. 40(2001), p.21.

Google Scholar

[6] C.X. Li: Energy for Metallurgical Industry Vol. 22, No.4(2003), p.43.

Google Scholar

[7] R.L. Webb and N.H. Kim: Principles of enhanced heat transfer (Taylor&Francis, New York 1994).

Google Scholar

[8] S.Y. Kim, J.W. Paek and B.H. Kang: ASME J. Heat Transfer Vol. 122(2000), p.572.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Jia and J.S. Li: Journal of Thermal Science Vol.13, No.4(2004), p.366.

Google Scholar

[10] C.C. Gentry: Chemical Engineering Progress Vol. 86, No. 7(1990), p.48.

Google Scholar

[11] T.Z. Ming, Y. Zheng Y: Journal of the Energy Institute Vol. 83, No.1(2010), p.17.

Google Scholar

[12] M.K. Alcam and M.A. Alnimr: International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer Vol. 41, No.2(1998), p.385.

Google Scholar

[13] D.H. Xia, Y. Zhang, Y.C. Shang and L.S. Xiao: Energy for Metallurgical Industry Vol.29, No.5(2010), p.47.

Google Scholar

[14] X.M. Zhang and Y. Ling: Carbon Technique Vol. 30, No. 5(2011), p.17.

Google Scholar

[15] S.M. Yang and W.Q. Tao: Heat Transfer(Higher Education Press, Beijing 2007).

Google Scholar