Nonlinear Modeling and Identification of Underwater Thruster

Article Preview

Abstract:

Complexity in modeling an underwater thruster analytically, leave system identification approached a good option on developing accurate dynamic model for underwater thruster. Nonlinearity of the system due to fluid solid interaction such as, hydrodynamic force hitting the propeller blade make the system identification became a trivial task. This paper presents nonlinear modeling and identification of the underwater thruster from input–output measurement. The system was fully submerged, and current was varied as the input and the output thrust was measured using load cell. Nonlinear Hammerstein method is chosen for identification of the system. The results are numerically and graphically presented. The nonlinear system identification with second order linear dynamics gave the best result, where is the model, can fit up to 82 % of the real response of the thrust. The finding of the model can be utilized in the future to improve underwater vehicle performance by developing optimum control algorithm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 622-623)

Pages:

1217-1220

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E.A. de Barros, J.L.D. Dantas: Effect of a propeller duct on AUV maneuverability, Ocean Engineering, Volume 42. ( 2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.014

Google Scholar

[2] Kim, J. & Chung, W.K.: Accurate and practical thruster modeling for underwater vehicles, Ocean Engineering, vol. 33. (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.07.008

Google Scholar

[3] Roque Saltaren Pazmiño, Cecilia E. Garcia Cena, Cesar Alvarez Arocha, Rafael Aracil Santonja: Experiences and results from designing and developing a 6 DoF underwater parallel robot, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Volume 59. ( 2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2010.10.005

Google Scholar

[4] Muhamad Husaini, Zahurin Samad, and Mohd Rizal Arshad: CFD Simulation of Cooperative AUV Motion, Indian Journal of Marine Science (IJMS), Vol. 38(3). (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] Wei Wu, Da-Wei Jhao, Control of a direct internal reforming molten carbonate fuel cell system using wavelet network-based Hammerstein models, Journal of Process Control, Volume 22. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.01.011

Google Scholar

[6] Luigi Piroddi, Marcello Farina, Marco Lovera, Black box model identification of nonlinear input–output models: A Wiener–Hammerstein benchmark, Control Engineering Practice. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2012.03.002

Google Scholar

[7] Necla Togun, Sedat Baysec, Tolgay Kara, Nonlinear modeling and identification of a spark ignition engine torque, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Volume 26. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.010

Google Scholar

[8] J. Ward MacArthur, A new approach for nonlinear process identification using orthonormal bases and ordinal splines, Journal of Process Control. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.12.011

Google Scholar