Two-Phase Jet in Process of Pneumatic Powder Injection into Liquid Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The short description of the new approach to the pneumatic powder injection process analysis was presented in the article. The experiments with the high speed camera recording of the two-phase jet in pneumatic powder injection process were carried out in the Department of Foundry, Silesian University of Technology, Poland. The results were briefly analyzed and some interesting conclusions appeared, especially that the real velocity of the injected particles is far less than it is normally calculated with use of the well-known formulas. They were compared with existing literature data as well as with some experimentspreviously made by authors. Powder particles velocity and two-phase jet mass concentration were analyzed as the most important parameters for powder injection process. The results described are part of the complex experimental plan and the next step is computer modeling (just launched) of the jet introducing liquid.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 622-623)

Pages:

447-451

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Janerka, S. Jura, H. Szlumczyk, J. Jezierski, D. Homa: Solidification of Metals and Alloys Vol. 39 (1999), p.113.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Jezierski, S. Jura, K. Janerka: Archives of Foundry, Vol. 1, No 1 (2001) p.161.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Jezierski, K. Janerka, J. Szajnar: Archives of Foundry, Vol. 6, No 18 (2006), p.535.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Jezierski, K. Janerka: Conference Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Brno, Czech Republic, May 18-20, (2011) p.150.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Jezierski, S. Jura, K. Janerka: Archives of Foundry, Vol. 1, No 1 (2001) p.45.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Pietrowski, A. Cyprys, M. Rychta: Archives of Foundry, Vol. 1, No 1 (2001) p.237.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Senk, H. W. Gudenau, S. Geimer, E. Gorbunowa: ISIJ International, Vol. 46, No. 12 (2006) p.1745.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Scheepers, J.J. Eksteen, C. Aldrich: Minerals Engineering, Vol. 19 (2006) p.1163.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Holtzer, M. Niesler, C. Podrzucki, M. Rupniewski: Archives of Foundry, Vol. 6, No. 20 (2006) p.111.

Google Scholar

[10] J. L. Xia, T. Ahokainen, L. Holappa: Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, An International Journal, Vol. 1, No. 4, (2001) p.178.

Google Scholar

[11] R.G. Hou, C. Z. Huang, Y.S. Feng: Surface Finishing Technology And Surface Engineering Book Series: Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 53-54 (2008) p.369.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Yamanoglu, R. I. L. Guthrie, D. Mazumdar: Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1 (1999) p.61.

Google Scholar

[13] K. Yamaguchi: Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Vol. 39, No. 1 (1998) p.53.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Kosowski: Foundry Review, No. 1-3, (1982), p.11.

Google Scholar

[15] K. Janerka, S. Jura, J. Jezierski, H. Szlumczyk: Archives of Foundry, Vol. 1, No 1 (2001) p.489.

Google Scholar

[16] L.R. Farias, G.A. Irons: Metallurgical Transactions B, Vol. 17B, No. 4, (1986), p.77.

Google Scholar

[17] T.A. Engh, K. Larsen: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, No. 6 (1979)p.268.

Google Scholar

[18] T.W. Davies, O. Caretta, C.J. Densham, R. Woods: Powder Technology, Vol. 201(2010)p.296.

Google Scholar