Analysis for Gene Logic Networks of Colon Cancer

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper took a set of published colon cancer gene expression profiles for example, to show how to establish a gene expression regulation network with logic relationships. The research improved the original algorithm with supported value, then deciphered and confirmed some nonlinear genes functions. This work also provided valuable reference and guidance for biologists to understand and explain some genes function in pathological changes. Gene logic networks have significant meanings for researching gene functions within cells.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

773-777

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kinzlerx ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell, 1990, 66: 589-600.

Google Scholar

[2] Symyrk T, Lynch HT. Colorectal cancer: molecular and cellular abnomalities. In: Bertino JR. Encyclopedia of cancer. San Deigo: Academic Press, 1997, 1: 451-463.

Google Scholar

[3] Hartwell LH, John J, Leibler S, et al. Murray From moecular to modular cell biology[J]. Nature, 1999, 402: 47-52.

Google Scholar

[4] Bowers PM, Cokus SJ, D. Eisenberg, et al. Use of Logic Relationships to Decipher Protein Network Organization. Science. 2004, 306(5706): 2246-2249.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1103330

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang X, Kim S, Wang T, et al. Joint learning of logic relationships for studying protein function using phylogenetic profiles and the Rosetta Stone method. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING. 2006, 54(6): 2427-2435.

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2006.873718

Google Scholar

[6] Wu J, Mellor JC, DeLisi C. Deciphering Protein Network Organization Using Phylogenetic Profile Groups. Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics. 2005, 16 (1): 142-149.

Google Scholar

[7] Enright AJ, Iliopoulos L, Kyrpides NC, et al. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature. 1999, 402 (6757): 86-90.

DOI: 10.1038/47056

Google Scholar

[8] Bowers PM, O'Connor BD, Cokus SJ, et al. Utilizing logical relationships in genomic data to decipher cellular processes. The FEBS journal. 2005, 272 (20): 5110-5118.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04946.x

Google Scholar

[9] Ramazzina I, Cendron L, Folli C, et al. Logical identification of an allantoinase analog (puuE) recruited from polysaccharide deacetylases. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283(34): 23295-23304.

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m801195200

Google Scholar

[10] Wang S, Yan C, Wang Q, et al. Analysis for Stimuli to Shoot Genes of Arabidopsis Thaliana Based on Logical Relationships. The Third International Symposium on Optimization and Systems Biology. 2009, 435-447.

Google Scholar

[11] Cui J, DeLuca TF, Jung JY et al. Phylogenetically informed logic relationships improve detection of biological network organization. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011, 12: 476-486.

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-476

Google Scholar

[12] Laiho P, Kokko A, Vanharanta S, et al. Serrated carcinomas form a subclass of colorectal cancer with distinct molecular basis. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 321-320.

DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209778

Google Scholar

[13] Pavlidis P, Weston J, Cai J, Noble WS. Learning gene functional classifications from multiple data types. Journal of Computational Biology. 2002, 9(2): 401–411.

DOI: 10.1089/10665270252935539

Google Scholar

[14] http: /www. genome. jp/dbget-bin/show_pathway?hsa05210+3845.

Google Scholar

[15] Strathdee G, Sansom OJ, Sim A, et al. A role for mismatch repair in control of DNA ploidy following DNA damage. Oncogene. 2001, 20: 1923–(1927).

DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204276

Google Scholar

[16] Kong M, Bai M, Wang JZ. Wnt signal transduction pathways and relationships with colon cancer. Chinese Journal of Cell Biology. 2003, 25(6): 343-347.

Google Scholar

[17] Yin HH, Liao WJ, Gao Y, et al. Expression of β-Catenin and LEF-1 in Malignant Melanoma. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY. 2005, 38(11): 665-667.

Google Scholar