Optimize the Governance Structure of Private Enterprises from Social Angle

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because the optimization objective for governance system of Private enterprise is not to accurate, this thesis proves that the optimization objective for governance system of Private enterprise is not the maximization of “boss” interests, but also should be the maximization of enterprise and social efficiency, as well as the maximization of social total welfare; For Private enterprise, which kind of governance system is the most optimal, depending on the objective that is to ensure the interests of family controlling shareholders, or to protect the interests of non-controlling shareholders, or to meet the requirements of society and government for the enterprises. Different angles have different optimal standard, the Government will have to play a comprehensive role in guiding and leading. For that, Private enterprise should implement the system of distributing the number of director, setting up the shareholder committee, the source of supervisor socialization, the authority of supervisors' board higher than directors’ board, bringing employee into the governance framework, and implement government audit.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

962-967

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Liu Jinhong , Control, Cash flow Rights, and Corporate Performance: A research on Private Listed Companies in China, Finance & Economics, no. 5, P64-71. (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] Song Jinbin Lu Yi Yan Rende, Analysis of Building Perfect Corporate Governance for Private Companies, Shanghai Management Science, no. 1, P11-13. (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] Yi Min, Sun Da Wu s Reformation, Executive, no. 4, P10-12, (2005).

Google Scholar

[4] Qiao Chunhua, Jiang Suya, The Status and Function of Audit in Corporate Governance, Auditing Research, no. 1 P63-66, (2006).

Google Scholar