Effect of Different Surfactant on Leaching of Uranium in Sandstone Type Ores with Low Permeability

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper researched the effect of six surfactant including aodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate(SDBS)、cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide(CTAB)、po1yoxyethylene octylphenol ether (OP-10)、Triton X-100(TX-100)、FSO and their mixture on surface tension of the leaching solution and on leaching rate of uranium in sandstone uranium ores. Results showed that all kinds of surfactant could observably reduce the surface tension of the leaching solution at low concentration. The surface tension of leaching solution containing 1g/L FSO and 0.01g/L mixture surfactant(mOP-10 /mFSO; 7:3) was 20.7mN/m and 17.9 mN/m respectively. Results of agitation leach experiments showed that FSO and the system of OP-10 and FSO could improve the leaching rate, and the leaching rate of uranium could be increased by 14.16% and 16.08% to 92.54% and 94.09% respectively. These results indicated that the way of reducing the surface tension of the leaching solution could improve the leaching rate of uranium.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 634-638)

Pages:

3335-3338

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] IAEA. Recent developments in uranium resources and production with emphasis on in-situ leach mining. IAEA-TECDOC-1396, Vienna, Austria, (2004)

Google Scholar

[2] IAEA. Manual of acid in situ leach uranium mining technology. IAEA-TECDOC-1239, Vienna, Austria, 2001.

Google Scholar

[3] Wang H F, Que W M, Zhong P R, et al. Technology and application of in-situ leach of uranium. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press,1998 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Tan K X, Wang Q L, Liu Z H, et al. Nonlinear dynamics of flow-reaction coupling in porous media and application to in-situ leaching uranium mining. International Journal of Modern Physics B 2004, 18: 2663-2668

DOI: 10.1142/s0217979204025877

Google Scholar

[5] Chen Y. The recent progress of uranium exploration in China. In: Uranium Production and Raw Materials for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle – Supply and Demand, Economics, the Environment and Energy Security, IAEA-CN-128, Vienna, 2006, 57-62

Google Scholar

[6] Owusu G, Dreisinger D B, Peters E. Effect of surfactants on zinc and iron dissolution rates during oxidative leaching of sphalerite. Hydrometallurgy, 1995, 38: 315-324

DOI: 10.1016/0304-386x(94)00061-7

Google Scholar

[7] Karavasteva M. The effect of certain surfactants on the acid and neutral leaching of zinc calcine obtained by roasting of sphalerite concentrates. Hydrometallurgy, 2001, 62 : 151-156

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-386x(01)00194-3

Google Scholar

[8] ZhuoY L, Yue H H, Wen Q Q. Effect of surfactant OPD on the bioleaching of marmatite. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 22: 10-13

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2008.03.002

Google Scholar

[9] Causse J, Faure S. Acidic surfactant solutions for tributyl phosphate removal in nuclear fuel reprocessing plants: A formulation study . Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 147: 180–187

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.06.033

Google Scholar