A Novel Effective Y-Shaped Silicon Stent for Treating Canalicular Laceration

Article Preview

Abstract:

Purpose: To introduce the novel effective Y-shaped silicon stent for treating canalicular laceration. Methods: Fifty-four canalicular laceration cases (54 eyes) underwent the lacrimal surgery using the novel Y-shaped silicon stents were collected, and the stents were removed 3 months after surgery. All cases were followed up for 12 months. The operability of stenting and removing the stent were assessed. The data we collected during each follow-up are: stent position and integrity, aesthetic results, the discomfort, the symptom of epiphora, the patency of lacrimal passage, complications, and patient’s satisfaction. Results: The stenting time was 14.3±5.8 min and the time of removing it was 1.8±0.5 min. Both of the operability of stenting and removing were accessed to be easy in more than 94.4% cases. All stents were in position and integrated. 51 cases (94.4%) had no problems on aesthetic results. Three patients (5.4%) complained about the discomfort. Two cases (3.7%) had the symptom of epiphora, which were obstructed after removing the stents. Fifty-two cases (96.3%) were with patent canaliculus and satisfied with the surgery and symptom improvement. Only 5 cases (9.3%) had complications. Conclusion: The novel Y-shaped silicon stent is an effective stent for treating canalicular laceration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 652-654)

Pages:

449-453

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, et al. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2008, 145: 375-380.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.018

Google Scholar

[2] Lindsey JT. Lacrimal duct injuries revisited: a retrospective review of six patients [J]. Ann Plast Surg 2000, 44: 167-172.

DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200044020-00008

Google Scholar

[3] Song HY, Jim HY, Kim JH, et al. Nonsurgical placement of a nasolacrlmal polyurethane stent: long-term effectiveness[J]. Radiology 1996, 200: 759.

DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756928

Google Scholar

[4] Information on http: /www. tqkeji. com.

Google Scholar

[5] Kersten RC, Kulwin DR. One-stitch, canalicular repair[J]. Ophthalmology 1996, 103: 785-789.

DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30615-5

Google Scholar

[6] Fayet B, Bernard JA. A monocanalicular stent with self-stabilizing meatic fixation in surgery of excretory lacrimal ducts[J]. Initial results]. Ophtalmologie 1990, 4: 351-357.

Google Scholar

[7] Benger RS, Nemet AY. Peripunctal anchor, suture for securing the silicone bicanalicular stent in the repair of canalicular lacerations[J]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008, 24: 51-53.

DOI: 10.1097/iop.0b013e31815c937c

Google Scholar

[8] Leibovitch I, Kakizaki H, Prabhakaran V, et al. Canalicular lacerations: repair with the Mini-Monoka monocanalicular intubation stent[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2010, 41: 472-477.

DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20100525-05

Google Scholar

[9] Dawood A, Tanner S, Hutchison I. A new implant for nasal reconstruction[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012, 27: 90-92.

Google Scholar

[10] Oghan F , Ozcura F. A novel stenting technique in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008, 265: 911-915.

DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0579-y

Google Scholar

[11] Zhang JX, Deng HW, Yan B. A novel retrograde intubafion procedure for treatment of nasolacrimai duct obstruction[J]. Chin J Ophthalmal 2007, 43: 806-809.

Google Scholar

[12] Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The round-tipped, eyed pigtail probe for canalicular intubation: a review of 228 patients[J]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008, 24: 176-180.

DOI: 10.1097/iop.0b013e31816b99df

Google Scholar

[13] Wu SY, Ma L, Chen RJ, Tsai YJ, et al. Analysis of bicanalicular nasal intubation in the repair of canalicular lacerations[J]. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010, 54: 24-31.

DOI: 10.1007/s10384-009-0755-7

Google Scholar

[14] Dresner SC, Codere F, Brownstein S, Jouve P. Lacrimal drainage system inflammatory masses from retained silicone tubing[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 1984, 98: 609-613.

DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90247-2

Google Scholar

[15] Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2008, 145: 375-380.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.018

Google Scholar

[16] Drnovsek-Olup B, Beltram M. Trauma of the lacrimal drainage system: retrospective study of 32 patients[J]. Croat Med J 2004, 45: 292-294.

Google Scholar

[17] Liang T, Zhao KX, Zhang LY. A clinical application of laser direction in anastomosis for inferior canalicular laceration[J]. Chin J Traumatol 2006, 9: 34 -37.

Google Scholar

[18] Conlon MR, Smith KD, Cadera W, et al. An animal model studying reconstruction techniques and histopathological changes in repair of canalicular lacerations[J]. Can J Ophthalmol 1994, 29: 3-8.

Google Scholar

[19] Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, et al. Management of Canalicular Lacerations: Epidemiological Aspects and Experience with Mini-Monoka Monocanalicular Stent[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 2008, 145: 375-380.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.018

Google Scholar