A Method for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Complementary Preference Information on Alternatives

Article Preview

Abstract:

The multi-attribute decision making (MADM) problem, in which the information about attribute weights are known partly and the decision maker (DM) has fuzzy complementary preference relation on alternatives, is investigated in this paper. Firstly, The objective decision-making information based on the subjective fuzzy complementary preference information on alternatives is uniformed by using a translation function. Secondly, a goal programming model is established. The attribute weights are obtained by solving the model, thus the overall values of the alternatives are gained by using the additive weighting method. Based on these values, the ranking priorities or selecting the best on alternatives are processed. The method can sufficiently utilize the objective information of alternatives and meet the subjective requirements of the DM as much as possible, and it is also characterized by simple operation and easy to implement on a computer. Finally, a practical example is illustrated to show the feasibility and availability of the developed method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

541-545

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C L Hwang, K Yoon. Multiple Attribute Decision Making [M]. Berlin: Spring-Verlag, (1981).

Google Scholar

[2] D F Li. Two New Methods for Multi-attribute Decision Makings with Information Partially Known [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 1998, 17(1): 70-74.

Google Scholar

[3] J R Shi, S Y Liu, W T Xiong. A Method of Ranking Alternatives in Multiple Attribute Decision Making [J]. Systems Engineering, 2004, 22 (7): 99-107.

Google Scholar

[4] J Q Wang. Study on hierarchical discrimination approach of multi-criteria classification with incomplete information [J]. Control and decision, 2004, 19(11): 1237-1240.

Google Scholar

[5] Z C Yu, T H You,R Zhang etc. A Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method Based on Incomplete Weight Information [J]. Systems Engineering theory methodology applications, 2005, 14(6): 506-508.

Google Scholar

[6] J Q Wang, B He. Method for multi-criteria decision with indefinite information based on evidential reasoning and its application [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2005, 27(4): 383-387.

Google Scholar

[7] H A Zhou,S Y Liu. Approach to Multi-attribute Decision-making and Theoretic Proof of Its Solution Based on Two-phase Optimizations [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2005, 27(8): 1425-1427.

Google Scholar

[8] G X Song, D L Yang. Combination weighting approach based on the decision-maker's preference and consistency of weighting methods [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26(9): 1227- 1290.

Google Scholar

[9] H Y Chen. Combination determining weights method for multiple attribute decision making based on maximizing deviation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26 (2): 194-197.

Google Scholar

[10] S L Yan, X P Xiao. Integrated Approach Based on Minimum Deviation Model for Mul ti-attribute Decision Making [J]. Systems Engineering.

Google Scholar

[11] Z P Fan, J Ma, Q Zhang. An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002, 131: 101-106.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(01)00258-5

Google Scholar

[12] Z S Xu,. A Method for Multi-attribute Decision Making without Weight Information but with Preference Information on Alternatives [J]. Systems Engineering—Theory and Practice (in Chinese), 2003, 23(12): 100-103.

Google Scholar

[13] J Ma, Z P Fan , L H Huang. A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 112: 397-404.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00141-6

Google Scholar

[14] J Wu, C Y Liang, W H Li. Method to determine attribute weights based on subjective and objective integrated [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2007, 29(3): 383- 387.

Google Scholar

[15] Z S Xu. Method for multi-attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives under partial weight information. [J]. Control and decision, 2004, 19(1): 85-88.

Google Scholar

[16] W T Xiong, S Y Liu, W H Li. A Method to Determine Multi-attribute Weights Based on Sensitivity Analysis [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2004, 26(12): 92-95.

Google Scholar