3D MRO Job Card Publishing Method for Aircraft

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to improve the accuracy of maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) description and the clarity of on-site guidance for aircraft MRO job card, a publishing method for aircraft 3D MRO job card based on aircraft 3D model was proposed. This method can show the disassembly and assembly simulation process with dynamic viewpoint navigation technology to conform to the observation habit of human, and separately show technical requirements from different MRO disciplines and operation tasks with multi-view 3D annotation method, and finally, transforms the MRO order into 3D portable job card file based on lightweight model and releases it to MRO site. The MRO instance of aircraft right wing shows that this method can generate intuitive, accurate and non-ambiguous MRO process description, improve the quality and efficiency of aircraft MRO.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

345-350

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.G. Lee, Y. -S. Ma, G.L. Thimm, J. Verstraeten, Product lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul, Computers in Industry 59 (2008) 296-303.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.022

Google Scholar

[2] Liu Ming, Zuo Hongfu, Geng Duanyang, Cai Jing, Expert system of maintenance review board report based on CBR and RBR, Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 5 (2006) 521-525.

Google Scholar

[3] Yu Fengjie, Ke Yinglin, Ying Zheng, Decision on failure maintenance for aircraft automatic join-assembly system, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 15 (9) (2009) 1823-1830.

Google Scholar

[4] Johannes Christian, Horst Krieger, Andreas Holzinger, Reinhold Behringer, Virtual and Mixed Reality Interfaces for e-Training: Examples of Applications in Light Aircraft Maintenance, in: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Universal access in human-computer interaction: applications and services (UAHCI 2007), 2007, p.520.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_58

Google Scholar

[5] Sajay Sadasivan, Deepak Vembar, Carl Washburn, Anand K. Gramopadhye, Evaluation of Interaction Devices for Projector Based Virtual Reality Aircraft Inspection Training Environments, in: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Virtual reality (ICVR 2007), 2007, p.533.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73335-5_58

Google Scholar

[6] Lu Zhong, Sun Yongchao, Disassembly sequence planning of civil aircraft products for maintainability design, Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica 31 (1) (2010) 143-150.

Google Scholar

[7] Shu Li, Liu Yi, Liu Jia, Nandong Wang, The application research on the virtual maintenance in aircraft design, in: Reliability, The 8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability & Safety (ICRMS 2009), 2009, p.678–683.

DOI: 10.1109/icrms.2009.5270103

Google Scholar

[8] Christiand, Jungwon Yoon, Optimal assembly path planning algorithm for aircraft part maintenance, in: International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2007), 2007, pp.2190-2194.

DOI: 10.1109/iccas.2007.4406696

Google Scholar

[9] Hao Xu, Pu Wan, An improved genetic algorithm for solving simulation optimization problems, International Journal of the Physical Sciences 6 (10) (2011) 2399-2404.

Google Scholar

[10] LIU Jian-hua, NING Ru-xin, WAN Bi-le, XIONG Zhen-qi, Research of complex product assembly path planning in virtual assembly, Journal of System Simulation 19 (9) (2007) 2003-(2007).

Google Scholar

[11] Lian Ding, Alex Ball, Jason Matthews, Chris McMahon, Manjula Patel, Product representation in lightweight formats for product lifecycle management (PLM), in: 4th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology (DET 2007), (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] Lian Ding, Dannie Davies, Christopher A. McMahon, The integration of lightweight representation and annotation for collaborative design representation, Research in Engineering Design 19 (4) (2009) 223-238.

DOI: 10.1007/s00163-008-0052-3

Google Scholar