Research on Co-Branding Strategy in New Materials Industry

Article Preview

Abstract:

In many areas of business, brand joint has been used for many large multinational corporations. This article ,firstly, it reviews the evaluation factors for brand joint. Then, it reviews the brand joint feedback effects. Then, it reviews the relative contribution factors of brand joint problems. Finally, it stated the business opportunities to the new materials industry brought by the co-branding strategy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

767-770

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] YuanYongDan, DongDaHai, LiuRuiMing, JinYuFang. Brand joint research progress [J]. Journal of management, 2007, 4 (2) : 243-248.

Google Scholar

[2] SIMONIN B L, RUTH J A. Is A Company Known by the Company It Keeps: Assessing The Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Atti-tudes [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1998, 35(1): 30-42.

DOI: 10.2307/3151928

Google Scholar

[3] RAO A R, QU L, RUEKERT R W. Signaling Unobservable Product Quality through A Brand Ally [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1999, 36(2): 258-268.

DOI: 10.1177/002224379903600209

Google Scholar

[4] MCCARTHY M S, NORRIS D G. Improving Com-petitive Position Using Branded Ingredients [J]. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 1999, 8(4): 267-285.

DOI: 10.1108/10610429910284210

Google Scholar

[5] PARK C W, JUN S Y, SCHOCKER A. Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1996, 33(4): 453-466.

DOI: 10.1177/002224379603300407

Google Scholar

[6] Anderson, N.H. (1981) Foundations of Information Integration The-ory, Academic Press, New York, NY.

Google Scholar

[7] LEVIN A M, DAVIS J C, LEVIN I P. Theoretical and Empirical Linkages between Consumers' Responses to Different Branding Strategies[J]. Ad-vances in Consumer Research, 1996, 23 (1): 296-300.

Google Scholar