A Study on Hydrogen Sulphide as Potential Tracer in Landfill Gas Monitoring

Article Preview

Abstract:

Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills are one of the major source of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) which is the offensive odours potentially creating annoyance in adjacent communities. This project focuses on H2S emission from landfills in Perlis, Malaysia. Landfill gas (LFG) samples were collected and analyzed accordance with NIOSH method 6013. The mean concentrations of H2S in Kuala Perlis Landfill and Padang Siding Landfill are 210.68 ppm and 242.85 ppm respectively. High concentrations of H2S may be a concern for employees working on the landfill site. These results indicate that workers should use proper personal protection at landfill when involved in excavation, landfill gas collection, and refuse compaction. The formation of H2S most likely to be contributed by the biological conversion of sulfate from gypsum-rich soils and landfill wastewater treatment sludges by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) which can utilize dissolved sulfate as an electron acceptor. H2S is conveniently detected by hand held analyzer, such Jerome meter, landfill gas analyzer. In the organic range, in the ease of detection range in the dispersion rate within the landfill site, the monitored H2S gas form a very noticeable concentration with the travelling wind direction. It proved that the dispersion rate of H2S are suitable as tracer to detect route of travelling in a certain distance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

189-193

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lee, S., Xu, Q., Booth, M., Townsend, T. G., Chadik, P., & Bitton, G. (2006). Reduced sulfur compounds in gas from construction and demolition debris landfill. Waste Management , 526-533.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.010

Google Scholar

[2] Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H., & Vigil, S. V. (1993). Intergrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and management issue. United State: McGraw-Hill.

Google Scholar

[3] Bogner, J., & Heguy, D. (2004). Hydrogen sulfide from landfilled construction-and-demolition debris: when and how. Municipal Solid Waste Management.

Google Scholar

[4] Christopher, H. D., Steve, W., Robert, C. L., David, C., Barbara, H., avid, R., et al. (2011). Relation Between malodor, ambient hydrogen sulfide, and health in a community bordering a landfill. Environmental Research , 847-852.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.05.021

Google Scholar

[5] Lawrence, N. S., Davis, J., & Compton, R. G. (2000). Compton, Analytical strategies for the detection of sulphide - a review. 771-784.

Google Scholar

[6] Beauchamp Jr., R. O., Bus, J. S., Popp, J. A., Boreiko, C. J., & Andjelovich, D. A. (1984). A critical review of the literature on hydrogen sulfide toxicity. CRC.

DOI: 10.3109/10408448409029321

Google Scholar

[7] Heroux, M., Page, T., Gelinas, C., & Guy, C. (2004). Evaluating odour impacts from a landfiling and composting site: Involving citizens in the monitoring. Water Science and Technology , 50 (4), 131-137.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0242

Google Scholar

[8] Brown, K. A., & Maunder, D. H. (1994). Water Sci. Technol. 143-151.

Google Scholar

[9] Stegman, R. (1996). Landfill gas utilisation. London: E. and F.N. Spon.

Google Scholar

[10] NIOSH, M. o. (1994, August 15). Centers of disease and prevention. Retrieved March 21, 2012, from NIOSH Manual of Analytical Method- Hydrogen Sulfide method 6013: http: /www. cdc. gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/6013. pdf.

Google Scholar

[11] Capelli, L., Sironi, S., Rosso, R.D., Centola, P., Grande, M.I., (2008). A comparative and critical evaluation of odour assessment methods on a landfill site. Atmospheric Environment. 42, 7050-7058.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.009

Google Scholar

[12] Fredenslund, A.M., Scheutz, C., Kjeldsen, P., (2010). Tracer method to measure landfill gas emissions from leachate collection systems. Waste management. 30, 2146-2152.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.013

Google Scholar