Using the Asphalt Pavement Dynamic Stiffness Modulus in Assessing Falling Weight Deflectometer Test Results

Article Preview

Abstract:

Assessing pavement quality has attracted significant interest in the literature. Despite this interest, what has been commonly overlooked in pavement research are cost and time related constraints imposed by the various most frequently employed methods. This study develops an approach for the rapid assessment of pavement structural quality that can be readily implemented in the field and can lead to limiting testing budget. Assessment is based on the Dynamic Stiffness Modulus (DSM) that has been recognized as a fairly accurate indicator of pavement quality. Results indicate that a DSM value of less than 0.80 indicates poor pavement conditions and a value higher than 1.20 indicates good pavement structural conditions. Also, the DSM shows a relatively good correlation with the asphalt pavement modulus in flexible pavements and, since the DSM can be easily produced in the field during testing, it can also be used to ascertain the amount of FWD testing required at each testing section.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

233-239

Citation:

Online since:

April 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yang H. Huang: Pavement Analysis and Design (Prentice Hall; 2nd edition, 2003)

Google Scholar

[2] H. Behbahani and S. A. Sahaf: International Journal of Civil Engineering Vol. 5, No. 3 (2007)

Google Scholar

[3] S.A. Schram and M. Abdelrahman: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2153 (2010), p.13–23

DOI: 10.3141/2153-02

Google Scholar

[4] Y.R. Kim: Modelling Of Asphalt Concrete (McGraw-Hill Professional, 2008)

Google Scholar

[5] R.W. Meier, Don R. Alexander and R.B. Freeman: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1570 (2007), p.126–133

Google Scholar

[6] A. Loizos and M.G. Karlaftis: Advances and Applications in Statistics, Vol. 6 (2006), pp.87-110

Google Scholar

[7] M.G. Karlaftis and E. Vlahogianni: Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol.19, Issue 3 (2011), p.387–399

DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.10.004

Google Scholar

[8] Y.C. Cheng and R.H. Bai: Advanced Materials Research, vol. 512-515 (2012), p.2923

Google Scholar

[9] A. Loizos, G. Boukovalas and A.G. Karlaftis: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 4 (2003), p.434 – 443

Google Scholar

[10] R. Hadidi, and N. Gucunski: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 3 (2010), pp.196-204

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Mehta and R. Roque: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2003), pp.25-31

Google Scholar

[12] A. Aavik., P. Paabo and T. Kaal: The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4 (2006), pp.193-199.

Google Scholar

[13] E. Horak: Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, Vol. 50, No. 2 (2008), p.2–9

Google Scholar

[14] M. Livneh: International Journal of Roads and Airports, Vol 1, No 2 (2011), pp.85-117

Google Scholar

[15] R.M. Fortes, J.V. Merighi, A.A. Bandeira, J.A.P. da Silva and R.Bichoff: 4th Int. Conf. on Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2007.

Google Scholar