Comparison Research on Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel after Laser Peened and Ultrasonically Peened

Article Preview

Abstract:

The mechanical properties of 1Cr11Ni2W2MoV stainless steel after laser peening (LP) and ultrasonic shot peening (USP) were examined and compared. The stainless steel specimens were treated with the two different surface processing techniques. X-ray diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), microhardness tester were used to investigate microstructure and mechanical properties. Vibration fatigue tests of untreated, LPed and USPed samples were also conducted. The results indicated that LP treatment can improved the fatigue life of 1Cr11Ni2W2MoV stainless steel more effectively. The increases of the compressive residual stress depth and microhardness in surface layer after LP were greater than that of USP. The SEM studies showed that USP treatment had an advantage in microstructure refinement. The compressive residual stresses make great contributions to the superiority of LP in the improvement of fatigue life of 1Cr11Ni2W2MoV stainless steel to USP.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 690-693)

Pages:

2107-2111

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Universal Technology Corporation, High Cycle Fatigue (HCF) Science and Technology Program 2002 Annual Report [R], AFRL-PR-WP-TM-2004-2040, America, (2003)

Google Scholar

[2] B.N. Mordyuk, Yu.V. Milman, M.O. Iefimov, et al, Surf. Coat. Technol, 202 (2008): 4875~4883

Google Scholar

[3] Lu K, Lu J: J Mater Sci Technol, 1999, 15(3): 193~197

Google Scholar

[4] Peyre P, Fabbro R, Merrier P, et al, Materials Science and Engineering, A210(1996): 102~113

Google Scholar

[5] Min Ya, Yongming Xing, Fulong Dai, et al, Surf. Coat. Technol, 168 (2003): 148~155

Google Scholar

[6] Thibaut Chaisea, et al, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 212(2012): 2080~(2090)

Google Scholar

[7] Tabor D: Philo Mag A, 1996, 74(5): 1207~1212

Google Scholar

[8] Inés Fermández Pariente, Mario Guagliano: Surf. Coat. Technol, 2008, 202(13): 3072~3080

Google Scholar

[9] T. Roland, D. Retraint, K. Lu, et al, Scripta Materialia, 54(2006): (1949)

Google Scholar