Slip-Resistance Assessment on Different Types of Emery Anti-Slip Strip

Article Preview

Abstract:

Anti-slip strip was one of the most popular slip-resistant products indoor and outdoor, especially on the ramp. By using anti-slip strip the roughness of floor can be increased, the COF will be increased and the risk of slips and falls will be reduced at the same time. This study wanted to find out the effects of slip-resistance under different particle sizes of steel grit, different floor contamination conditions and different inclined angles while using the emery anti-slip strip. The results demonstrated that the particle size of steel grit used on the emery anti-slip strip has significant influence on the COF. When footwear had no groove under the shoe sole or the groove had been abraded badly, the particle size had to be big enough to perform the function of the anti-slip especially under the floor contamination of glycerol and water. Therefore, the study suggested that the particle size of steel grit used on the emery anti-slip strip should be larger than 500μm to provide fine anti-slip effects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 690-693)

Pages:

3436-3440

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Grönqvist, J. Abeysekera, G. Gard, S.M. Hsiang, T.B. Leamon, D. J. Newman, K. Gielo-Perczak, T. E. Lockhart, Y.C. Pai, Human-centered approaches in slipperiness measurement, Ergonomics. 44 (2001) 1167-1199.

DOI: 10.1080/00140130110085556

Google Scholar

[2] T.B. Leamon, P.L. Murphy, Occupational slips and falls: more than a trivial problem, Ergonomics.38 (1995) 487-498.

DOI: 10.1080/00140139508925120

Google Scholar

[3] W.R. Chang, S. Matz, The Slip Resistance of Common Footwear Materials Measured with Two Slipmeters, Applied Ergonomic. 32 (2001) 549-558.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(01)00031-x

Google Scholar

[4] K.W. Li, W.R. Chang, T.B. Leamon, C.J. Chen, Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditions, Safety Science. 42 (2004) 547-565.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2003.08.006

Google Scholar

[5] K.W. Li, H.H. Wu, Y.C. Lin, The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants, Applied Ergonomics. 37 (2006) 743-748.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.007

Google Scholar

[6] K.W. Li, W.R. Chang, J.C Wei., C.H. Kou, Friction Measurement on Ramps Using the Brungraber Mark II Slipmeter, Safety Science. 44 (2006) 375-386.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.11.003

Google Scholar

[7] W.R. Chang, R. Grönqvist, S. Leclercq, R. Myung, L. Makkonen, L. Strandberg, R.J. Brungraber, U.Mattke, S.C. Thorpe, The Role of Friction in the Measurement of Slipperiness, Part1; Friction Mechaniness and Definition of Test Conditions, Ergonomics. 44 (2001) 1217-1232.

DOI: 10.1080/00140130110085574

Google Scholar

[8] I.J. Kim, R. Smith, H. Nagata, Microscopic observations of the progressive wear on the shoe surfaces that affect the slip resistance characteristics, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 28 (2001) 17-29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(01)00010-5

Google Scholar

[9] I.J. Kim, Development of a new analyzing model for quantifying pedestrian slip resistance characteristics: PartⅠ–Basic concepts and theories, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 33 (2004) 395-401.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.10.010

Google Scholar

[10] I.J. Kim, Development of a new analyzing model for quantifying pedestrian slip resistance characteristics: PartⅡ–Experiments and validations, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 33 (2004) 403-414.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.10.011

Google Scholar

[11] W.R. Chang, Y.H. Huang, K.W. Li, A. Filiaggi, T.K. Courtney, Assessing Slipperiness in Fast-Food Restaurants in the USA using Friction Variation and Friction Level and perceptual rating, Applied Ergonomics. 39 (2008) 359-367.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.08.004

Google Scholar

[12] L.W. Liu, K. W. Li, Y.H. Lee, C. C. Chen, C.Y. Chen, Friction measurements on "anti-slip" floors under shoe sole, contamination, and inclination conditions, Safety Science. 48 (2010) 1321-1326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.014

Google Scholar

[13] American Society for Testing and Materials, F-1677-96, Standard method of test for using a portable inclinable articulated strut slip tester (PIAST), Annual Book of ASTM Standards. vol. 15.07(2005). West Conshohochen, PA, American Society for Testing and Materials.

DOI: 10.1520/f1677-05

Google Scholar

[14] W.R. Chang, The Effect of Slip Criterion and Time on Friction Measurement, Safety Science. 40 (2002) 593-611.

Google Scholar

[15] W.R. Chang, I.J. Kim, D.P. Manning, B. Bunterngchit, The Role of Surface Roughness in the Measurement of Slipperiness, Ergonomics. 44 (2001) 1200-1216.

DOI: 10.1080/00140130110085565

Google Scholar

[16] A. Sariisik, S. Gurcan, A. Senturk, Description of slipping test methods and application study on travertine by ramp slip meter, Building and Environment. 42(2007) 1707-1710.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.01.020

Google Scholar

[17] A. Sariisik, Safety analysis of slipping barefoot on marble covered wet areas, Safety Science 47 (2009) 1417-1428.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.03.006

Google Scholar

[18] The Institute for safety & Health,The measurement of friction between shoe and floor surface under liquid and solid contamination. Institute for Safety & Health, Council of Labor Affairs, R.O.C., 2010.

Google Scholar

[19] K.W. Li, Y.W. Hsu, W.R. Chang, C.H. Lin, Friction Measurements on Three Commonly used Floors on a College Campus Under Dry, Wet, and Sand-Covered Conditions, Safety Science. 45 (2007) 980-992.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.030

Google Scholar