Elemental Ultrastructure of Bioleaching Bacteria and Archaea Grown on Different Energy Sources

Article Preview

Abstract:

The composition and distribution of elements within cells of two species of Fe and S oxidising microbes utilising S, Fe2+ or chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) as an energy source were compared to determine possible sites of oxidation and function of intracellular granules. The bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and the archaeon Metallosphaera hakonensis were examined using energy filtered transmission electron microscopy (EFTEM), TEM energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Scanning TEM (STEM) and electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS). Both species have intracellular granules and we show that these store Fe, S and P. The microbes slowly lost Fe from granules when switched to an Fe-free medium. EELS showed that the Fe in the granules of both species was consistent with Fe3+. Both microbes sometimes contain Cu and Si on their walls and intracellularly. Si concentrations have been shown to affect bioleach performance, so element deposition on the microbial catalyst may be a reason for this. Bands of Fe and S were present close to, or in, the cell membrane of M. hakonensis, as might be expected for the site of oxidation, and S also occurred throughout the cytoplasm. These are the first element maps of M. hakonensis, and these early results demonstrate that advanced characterisation and microanalysis techniques can provide insights into microbial processes involved in bioleaching.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 71-73)

Pages:

235-238

Citation:

Online since:

May 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Carlos, F.C. Reis, R. Vicentini, D.J. Madureira, L.M.M. Ottoboni: Curr. Microbiol. Vol. 57 (2008), p.357.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Bathe and P.R. Norris: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 73 (2007), p.2491.

Google Scholar

[3] T.M. Taha, T. Kanao, F. Takeuchi and T. Sugio: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 74 (2008), p.6808.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Rohwerder and W. Sand: Eng. Life Sci. Vol. 7 (2007), p.301.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Kornberg, N.N. Rao and D. Ault-Riche: Annu. Rev. Biochem. Vol. 68 (1999), p. 89S.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Alvarez and C. A. Jerez: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 70 (2004), p.5177.

Google Scholar

[7] F. Remonsellez, A. Orell and C.A. Jerez: Microbiol. Vol. 152 (2006), p.59.

Google Scholar

[8] C.C. Calvert, A. Brown and R. Brydson: J Electron Spectrosc. Rel. Phenom. Vol. 143 (2005), p.173.

Google Scholar

[9] Z. -W. Chen, C. -Y. Jiang, Q. She, S. -J. Liu and P-J. Zhou: Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Vol. 71 (2005), p.621.

Google Scholar

[10] K.O. Konhauser, V.R. Phoenix, S.H. Bottrel, D.G. Adams and I.M. Head: Sediment. Vol. 48 (2001), p.415.

Google Scholar

[11] D.R. Amores and L.A. Warren: Chem. Geol. Vol. 240 (2007), p.298.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Dopson, J-E Sundkvist and E. B Lindstrom: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 81 (2008), p.205.

Google Scholar

[13] W. Sand and T. Gehrke: Res. Microbiol. Vol. 157 (2006), p.49.

Google Scholar