A New Approach to Improve the Probability of Detection of Eddy Current Inspection

Wu Bo Zhang; Shu Li Pan; Ping Jie Huang; Di Bo Hou; Guang Xin Zhang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.712-715.2026

Paper Titles

The Improved Personnel Location Algorithm Based on RSSI
p.2003

A Two Dimension Signal Parameter Estimation Method Based on Super Resolution Technology
p.2007

Review on Meteorological Detector in Highway Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
p.2015

Design of Alarm Controllers in Detection and Alarm Systems for Gases
p.2021

A New Approach to Improve the Probability of Detection of Eddy Current Inspection
p.2026

The Applied Research of System Subtractive Clustering RBF Algorithm in Eddy Current Testing on the Conductive Structure Defect
p.2030

Quantitative Estimation with Lift-Off Effect in Conductive Structure
p.2035

Research of Benzoyl Peroxide Residues in Flour by Terahertz Spectroscopy Technology
p.2039

Study on Fault-Tolerant Technique Based on Knowledge Modules of Hydraulic Fault Theory
p.2043

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 712-715A New Approach to Improve the Probability of...

A New Approach to Improve the Probability of Detection of Eddy Current Inspection

Abstract:

Eddy current testing is now a widely used Non Destructive Test (NDT) method for determining the size of cracks in metallic structures. The probability of detection (POD) is a key metric in assessing the effectiveness of nondestructive evaluation techniques. The POD analysis using common method is studied and modified. The eddy current sensor effective is discussed to support the proposed method. The new method is shown better result in improve the POD than the common one. The estimates of POD as a function of crack size will be valuable for future model-assisted POD study.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Manufacturing Science and Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 712-715)

Pages:

2026-2029

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.712-715.2026

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2013

Authors:

Wu Bo Zhang, Shu Li Pan, Ping Jie Huang, Di Bo Hou, Guang Xin Zhang

Keywords:

Eddy Current, Probability of Detection (POD), Reliability

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Yang G, Tamburrino A, Udpa L, Udpa SS, Zeng Z, Deng Y, et al. Pulsed eddy- current based giant magnetoresistive system for the inspection of aircraft structures. IEEE Trans Magn 46(2010) 910–917.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2032330

Google Scholar

[2] Avrin WF. Eddy-current measurements with magnetoresistive sensors: third- layer flaw detection in a wing-splice structure 25 mm thick. Rev Progr QNDE 3994(2000) 29–36.

DOI: 10.1117/12.385032

Google Scholar

[3] Department of Defense Handbook, Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment, MIL-HDBK, 1823.

Google Scholar

[4] C.Mueller, T.Fritz, G.R. Tillack, C. Bellon and M.scharmach, Theory and Application of the Modular Approach to NDT Reliability, Material Evaluation, 59(2001) 871-874.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Lemire, T.W. Krause, M. Bunn and D.J. Butcher, "Variables Affecting Probabilityof Detection in Bolt Hole Eddy Current Inspection", Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 28 edited by: D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, to be published.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3114178

Google Scholar

[6] Thompson, R.B. Meeker W.Q.: Assessing the POD of HardAlpha inclusions from field data. Rev. Progr. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 26, 1759–1766 (2007)

Google Scholar