Germanium technology chain is technically interdependent between germanium intra-industry and industry, as a technical interface between the "chain", it's a series of processes between germanium intra-industry and related industries for the products or services of the final transaction the germanium. Yunnan has initially formed set germanium mining, deep processing, research and development of more complete integration of germanium technology chain. But Yunnan downstream processing technology chain only extended to the end products, accessories production. And the high value-added end products do not yet have the production technology to build a competitive technology chain. Therefore, Yunnan has to improve the technical level of the prior art chain, integrated innovation of technology chain, the introduction of the end-product technology chain, vigorously develop the build germanium manufacturing technology chain, development germanium reverse reuse, recycle, recycling and environmentally friendly processing technology chain positively .So that Yunnan technology chain can be developed and improved very well.
You might also be interested in these eBooks
Info:
© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved
[1]
Barton LD. Wellspring of Knowledge: Building and Sustain the Source of Innovation [M]. Boston: Harvard Business school Press，1995.
Google Scholar
[2]
Herderson RM，Clark KB. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firm[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly，1990, 35(l):9-30.
DOI: 10.2307/2393549
Google Scholar
[3]
Takeuehi H，NonakaI. Hitotsubashi on Knowledge Management [M]. Singapore: John Wiley &Sons(Asia) Pte Ltd.，2004.
Google Scholar
[4]
Albert，Armando，Plaza Luis M. The transfer of knowledge from the Spanish Public R&D System to the productive sectors in the field of biotechnology[J]. Scientomeric，2004，59(1):3-14.
DOI: 10.1023/b:scie.0000013295.88415.16
Google Scholar
[5]
Schilling MA. Strategic Management of Techno1ogy Innovation [M]. New york: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
Google Scholar
[6]
Henderson RM,Clark KB. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J].Administrative Science Quarterly，1990, 35:9-30.
DOI: 10.2307/2393549
Google Scholar
[7]
Takeuchi H，Nonaka I. Hitotsubashi on Knowledge Management[M]. Singapore: John Wiley &Sons(Asia) Pte Ltd.,2004.
Google Scholar
[8]
Anderson P, Tushman M. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(4):604-633.
DOI: 10.2307/2393511
Google Scholar
[9]
Suarez F. Battles for Technological Dominance: An Integrative Framework[J].Research Policy,2004,33(2):271-286.
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.001
Google Scholar
[10]
David Okrent. Risk Perception and Risk Management: On Knowledge, Resource Allocation and Equity[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1998,(59):79-98.
DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(97)00115-4
Google Scholar
