Testing and Analysis on Subway Station Structure under Dynamic Vibration Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

Structure health monitoring system is used to monitor structural responses in real time. Dynamic performances of subway station structures are help to analyze seismic performances of the structures. Through structure health monitoring system of a subway station structure, dynamic responses of the subway station structure were tested under railway loads. The dynamic strain and internal forces of subway station structure are obtained. As restrained by earth, dynamic responses of the subway station structure is not significant change from most surface structures. Wavelet and multiscale analysis can be a powerful tool for multiple decomposition of potential fields data. Wavelet analysis can eliminate the noise for a clear data. The main train induced vibration frequency is also acquired through the method of wavelet analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

648-652

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. H. An, A. A. Shawky and K. Maekawa, The Collapse Mechanism of a Subway Station during the Great Hanshin Earthquake, Cement and Concrete Composires, Vol.19,3(1997) , pp.241-257.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(97)00014-0

Google Scholar

[2] W.L. Wang, T.T. Wang, J.J. Su, et al., Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake, Tunnel Underground Space Technology, Vol.16,3(2001) ,pp.133-150.

DOI: 10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00047-5

Google Scholar

[3] Y.M.A. Hashash, J.J. Hook, B. Schmidt, et al., Seismic design and analysis of underground structures, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol.16,4(2001) ,pp.247-293.

DOI: 10.1016/s0886-7798(01)00051-7

Google Scholar

[4] J.M. Wang, Distribution of earthquake damage to underground facilities during the 1976 Tang-shan earthquake, Earthquake Spectra, Vol.1,4(1985) ,pp.741-757.

DOI: 10.1193/1.1585291

Google Scholar

[5] B. Schmidt, Y. Hashash and T. Stimac, US immersed tube retrofit, Tunnels Tunneling Int, Vol.30,11(1998) ,pp.22-24.

Google Scholar

[6] S. H. Nam, H.W. Song, K.J. Byun,et al., Seismic analysis of underground reinforced concrete structures considering elasto-plastic interface element with thickness, Engineering Structures, Vol.28,8(2006) ,pp.1122-1131.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.003

Google Scholar

[7] J. Chen, X. J. Shi and J. Li. Shaking table test of utility tunnel under non-uniform earthquake wave excitation, Soil dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.30,11(2010) ,p.1400–1416.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.014

Google Scholar

[8] G.W. Housner, L.A. Bergman, T.K. Caughey, et al., Structural Control: Past, Present, and Future, ASCE, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 123,9(1997) ,pp.897-971.

Google Scholar

[9] J. G. Liu, C. Schmidt-Hattenberger and G. Borm, Dynamic strain measurement with a fibre Bragg grating sensor system, Measurement, Vol.32,2(2002) ,pp.151-161.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-2241(02)00007-6

Google Scholar

[10] R. Maaskant, T. Alavie, R. M. Measures, et al., Fiber-optic Bragg Grating Sensors for Bridge Monitoring, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol.19,1(1997) ,pp.21-33.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(96)00040-6

Google Scholar

[11] L.B. Wan, Z.J. Wu, B.M. Zhang, et al., Determination of Internal Strain of Concrete Beam Using Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors, Journal of Optoelectronics•Laser, Vol.13,7(2002) ,pp.722-725.

Google Scholar