Experimental Investigation on Road Marking Distress Evolution: Beyond Testing, Quality Assurance and Maintenance Improvement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Road markings should always be visible, readable and effective. Their performance is related to the quality of materials, their application and textural characteristics of the road pavement. The evolution of properties (visibility, skid resistance, color and durability) also depends on the product, its resistance to traffic abrasion, the application technique and adhesion between coating and substrate. This paper analyzes the results of a wide campaign of tests (over more than 4,000 km of lines) on road marking performances, with the purpose of evaluating a model for design and maintenance management. Mainly post-sprayed coatings are investigated with regard to quality controls, their frequency and protocols, according to the standards in force.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

846-853

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] National Standards for Traffic Control Devices; the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. 23 CFR Part 655. Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 240 (2009). Rules and Regulations, [FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2007–28977] RIN 2125–AF22

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3846597

Google Scholar

[2] N. Abboud, B.L. Bowman, Establishing a Crash-Based Retroreflectivity Threshold, Transportation Research Board, 81th Annual Meeting January Washington, DC (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] J. R. Graham, J.K. Harrold, L.E. King, Pavement marking retroreflectivity requirements for older drivers, Transportation Research Record, 1529 (1996) 65-70.

DOI: 10.1177/0361198196152900108

Google Scholar

[4] J. Migletz, J.L. Graham, K.M. Bauer, D.W. Harwood, Field surveys of pavement-marking retroreflectivity, Transportation Research Record, 1657 (1999) 71-77.

DOI: 10.3141/1657-10

Google Scholar

[5] UNI 11248, Illuminazione stradale - Selezione delle categorie illuminotecniche, Milan (2012).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Schnell, F. Aktan, Y. Lee, Nightime Visibility and Retroreflectance of Pavement Marking under Dry, Wet and Rainy Conditions. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 82nd Annual Meeting, January (2003).

DOI: 10.3141/1824-16

Google Scholar

[7] F. Giuliani, S. Rastelli - Mesures de couleurs et de retroreflexion des materiaux pour revetements routiers en milieu urbain. Bulletin des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées n.266 (2007).

DOI: 10.4000/histoire-cnrs.435

Google Scholar

[8] Schréder Group, "Characterization of Road Surfaces using a Mobile Gonio-reflectometer", CIE NEWS, 78 (2006) 5-6.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Ohno, Chapter 14, Photometry and Radiometry - Review for Vision Optics, Part 2 Vision Optics, OSA Handbook of Optics, Volume III, McGraw-Hill, New York (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Casol, P. Fiorentin, A. Scroccaro, On road measurements of the luminance coefficient of paving, 16th IMEKO TC4 Symposium, Sept. 22-24, Florence, Italy (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] K. Rumar, D.K. Marsh II, Lane marking in night driving: a review of past research and of the present situation, Report No. UMTRI-98-50 (1998).

Google Scholar

[12] C. Debaillon, P. Carlson, T. Schnell, Y. He, G. Hawkins, Reccommendations for minimum pavement marking retroreflectivity values based on TARVIP analyses, Proceedings of the "18th Biennal Transportation Research Board Visibility Symposium", College Station, Texas (2007).

DOI: 10.3141/2055-09

Google Scholar

[13] H.T. Zwahlen, T. Schnell Minimum in-service retroreflectivity of pavement markings, In Transportation Research Record, 1715 (2000) 60-70.

DOI: 10.3141/1715-09

Google Scholar

[14] Retroreflection: Definition and Measurement. Technical Report CIE 54.2-2001, Commission Internationale De L'Éclairage, Vienna, Austria (2001).

Google Scholar

[15] S.O. Lundkvist, U. Isacsson, Prediction of road marking performance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133, no. 6 (2007) 341-346

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2007)133:6(341)

Google Scholar

[16] A.M. Pike, J.H. Hawkins, P.J. Carlson, Evaluating the Retro-reflectivity of Pavement Marking Materials Under Continuous Wetting Conditions. T. Research Record, 2015 (2007) 81-90.

DOI: 10.3141/2015-10

Google Scholar

[17] M. Pasetto, A. Manganaro, The "human" factor in the verification of the optical performances of materials for road marking with post-spraying, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, Calgary, 24-28 June, p.10 (2008).

Google Scholar

[18] M. Pasetto, S.D. Barbati, Definition and validation of a new methodological approach for friction evaluations of dropped-on products for road markings, 3rd International Surface Friction Conference, Safer Road Surfaces – Saving Lives, Gold Coast, Australia (2010).

Google Scholar

[19] L. Goubert, S.O. Lundkvist, Report of the first round robin test for mobile reflectometers. CEN/TC 226/WG2 (2011).

Google Scholar

[20] I. Bloss, Visible difference, Intertraffic World IW2011, Annual Showcase 2011, 39-42.

Google Scholar

[21] Zehntner Testing Instruments: Instruction manual ZDR 6020 Dynamic Retroreflectometer RL, Sissach, (2009).

Google Scholar

[22] NCHRP SYNTHESIS 408 - Project 20-05, Topic 39-13. Pavement Marking Warranty Specifications. A Synthesis of Highway Practice (2010).

Google Scholar