Numerical Simulation of Transient Flow in Products Pipeline

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, explicit difference scheme, implicit difference scheme and characteristics method are separately used to simulate the transient flow in products pipeline. The simulation result can be used to prevent water hammer in the pipeline of unsteady situation and to improve the efficiency and safety in oil transmission systems. And then, the stability and accuracy of the three methods are compared by adopting different time steps. For explicit difference method, large fluctuation may occur in case of large time step. For implicit method, the result is weakly affected by time step, only if the relaxation factor selected is reasonable. For characteristics method, the results have a high convergence speed and precision. The results show that, in the situation of valve shut down in terminal, it takes about 1.1×104 seconds to return to a new steady state.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 732-733)

Pages:

487-490

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yanbing Guo, Haijun Zhao, Heyi Liu. Hydraulic Analysis of Product Pipeline [J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2010 (004): 57-59. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Guoquan Zhang, Kai Liu. Surge Analysis on Products Oil Pipeline [J]. Oil & Gas Storage And Transportation, 2006, 25(12): 61-63. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Wenxi Tian, G.H. Su, Gaopeng Wang a, et al.. Numerical simulation and optimization on valve-induced water hammer characteristics for parallel pump feed water system. Annals of Nuclear Energy 35 (2008): 2280-2287.

DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.08.012

Google Scholar

[4] Xupeng Fang, Xiong Wei et al.. Study on the Transient Flow Control of Long-distance Oil Pipeline [J]. OGST, 2009, 28(2): 26-30. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Saikia M.D., Sarma A.K.. Simulation of water hammer flows with unsteady friction factor [J]. Arpn Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2006, 1(4): 35-40.

Google Scholar

[6] Larkin B K. Some stable explicit difference approximations to the diffusion equation [J]. Math. Comp, 1964, 18: 196-202.

DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-1964-0164450-x

Google Scholar

[7] M.H. Afshar, M. Rohani, R. Taheri. Simulation of transient flow in pipeline systems due to load rejection and load acceptance by hydroelectric power plants. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 52 (2010): 103-115.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.10.014

Google Scholar

[8] Briley W R, McDonald H. Solution of the multidimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations by a generalized implicit method [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1977, 24(4): 372-397.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90029-8

Google Scholar

[9] Briley W R, McDonald H. An overview and generalization of implicit Navier–Stokes algorithms and approximate factorization [J]. Computers & fluids, 2001, 30(7): 807-828.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7930(01)00030-5

Google Scholar

[10] Greyvenstein G P. An implicit method for the analysis of transient flows in pipe networks[J]. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2001, 53(5): 1127-1143.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.323

Google Scholar

[11] M. Rohani, M.H. Afshar. Simulation of transient flow caused by pump failure: Point-Implicit Method of Characteristics. Annals of Nuclear Energy 37 (2010): 1742-1750.

DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2010.07.004

Google Scholar

[12] K.H. Asli, Faig Bakhman Ogli Naghiyev, A. K. Haghi. Some aspects of physical and numerical modeling of water hammer in pipelines. Nonlinear Dyn 60 (2010): 677-701.

DOI: 10.1007/s11071-009-9624-7

Google Scholar

[13] A. Khamlichi, L. Jezequel, F. Tephany. Elastic-plastic water hammer analysis in piping systems. Wave Motion 22 (1995): 279-295.

DOI: 10.1016/0165-2125(95)00025-e

Google Scholar

[14] A. Riasi, A. Nourbakhsh, M. Raisee. Energy dissipation in unsteady turbulent pipe flows caused by water hammer. Computers & Fluids 73 (2013): 124-133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.12.015

Google Scholar

[15] Dan Jiang, Songjing Li, Kevin A. Edge, Wen Zeng. Modeling and simulation of low pressure oil-hydraulic pipeline transients. Computers & Fluids 67 (2012): 79-86.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.07.005

Google Scholar