Minimum Gas Influx Calculation in Gas Drilling after Water Production Based on Absorption Characteristics of Rock

Article Preview

Abstract:

In gas drilling, hole-cleaning problem is serious due to formation water production when water layer drilled. Drill pipe sticking will affect seriously and drilling work cannot carry out. Therefore, formation water production is the most serious case. In this paper, we research that if formation water production is small, there are two migration model in annulus considering water absorption characteristics of cuttings when formation water production is greater than water absorption. One situation is the migration occurs under the condition that cuttings completely absorb the formation water. Another is cuttings and pure liquid migrate in the form of liquid droplet at the same time when cuttings do not completely absorb formation water. By using the minimum kinetic energy method, we consider the effects of gas influx under the two conditions and find that in most cases liquid carrying need more minimal gas influx than cuttings carrying. When formation water production is small in drilling work, increasing the amount of gas injection should used in order to ensure gas drilling safely and smoothly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 734-737)

Pages:

1204-1208

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yun Zhuo, Xianzhi Hu: Aerated drilling used during gas drilling when encountering the formation water invasion, drilling emerging 31(8): 73-75.

Google Scholar

[2] HongWei Jiang, ShuBin Xing: Research On The Relation Of Air Volume Flow Rate And Formation Water Production In Air Drilling, PGODD, 2008, 27(2): 105-109.

Google Scholar

[3] Cunxin Wang, Yingfeng Meng: Study Advances In Gas Volume Requi- rement Calculation For Gas Drilling, Natur Gasind, 2006, 26(12): 97-98.

Google Scholar

[4] Biao Liu, Gang Liu: Further Discussion On Prediction Of Formation Water Discharge By Air Drilling, Fault-Block Oil, 2009, 16(3), 92-95.

Google Scholar

[5] William C. Lyons, Boyun Guo: Air And Gas Drilling Manual. McGraw-Hill Professional.(1976)

Google Scholar

[6] BeiDong Chen, KaiGui Liao: Gas Well Annulus With Capacity Of Quantitative Research, Oil Drilling Production Technology, 2007, 29(4), 4-9.

Google Scholar

[7] YeRong Zhao:Gas Drilling Theory With Practive, Petroleum Industry Press, 2007.

Google Scholar

[8] Tie Yan, ShunLi Liu, BiXueLiang: Theoretical Study of Minimum Gas Influx in Gas Drilling after Water Production from Unhydrated Forma- tion.Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2011, 39(2): 65-67.

Google Scholar

[9] Guo BnGhalambor A: Under-Balanced Drilling Gas Volume Flow is Calculated[M], China Petrochemical Press, 2006: 13-19

Google Scholar

[10] GuiLian Wang, DeJian Li: The Study of The Water Absorption Characteristics And Changes in Pore Structure of Rocks[C], 251-255.

Google Scholar

[11] HeHua Zhu, ZhiGuo Zhou: Acoustic Parameters of Low-Porosity Rock Under Dry And Saturated Conditions[J], Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(5): 823-828.

Google Scholar

[12] TABATABAEI M, GHALAMBOR A, GUO B. The minimum required gas- injection rate for liquid removal in air/gas drilling[R].SPE 116135, Colorado, USA: SPE, (2008)

DOI: 10.2118/116135-ms

Google Scholar

[13] GUO B, YAO YUAN. Liquid carrying capacity of gas in underbalanced drilling[R].SPE 113927, California, USA:SPE, 2008.

Google Scholar

[14] GUO B, GHALAMBOR A. Gas volume requirements for underbalanced drilling: deviated holes[M].Tulsa: Penn Well, 2002.

Google Scholar

[15] Feng Dai, Qin Li: Calculation of Critical Water-Carrying Capacity of Gas in Air Drilling[J]. Drilling Energing, 2010, 30(2): 94-96.

Google Scholar