Evaluation of Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Technologies

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper evaluates the results of two recent studies of advanced amine-based, post-combustion CO2 capture plant designs. The first study was conducted by the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG), while the second study was conducted by Parsons for the US DOEs National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Fluors improved monoethanolamine (MEA) process, known as the Econamine FG PlusSM technology, is utilised for both studies. Cost and performance estimates for both pulverized coal and natural gas-fired combined cycle plants are summarized. Differences between the design bases and assumptions for the two studies are discussed. The Econamine FG PlusSM technology, as an improved process in amine-based post-combustion CO2 capture described in this paper is leading to lower increases in the cost of electricity (COE). Both the DOE/Parsons and IEA GHG studies show that the increase is now down to 42 to 43% from as high as 60 to 70% indicated from previous studies for PC plants with CO2 capture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 734-737)

Pages:

1881-1886

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Improvement in Power Generation with Post-Combustion Capture of CO2, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Report Number PH4/33, November (2004)

Google Scholar

[2] Ronald L. Schoff: Updated Market-Based Advanced Coal Power Systems Comparison Study, presented at the 22nd Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, September 12-15, (2005)

Google Scholar

[3] Evaluation of Innovative Fossil Fuel Power Plants with CO2 Removal, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA U.S. Department of Energy – Office of Fossil Energy, Germantown, MD and U.S Department of Energy/NETL, Pittsburgh, PA: (2000)

Google Scholar

[4] Satish Reddy and John Gilmartin: Fluor's Econamine FG PlusSM Technology for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture, presented at GPA Gas Treatment Conference, February 2008.

Google Scholar

[5] Evaluation of Advanced Coal Technologies with CO2 Capture: Canadian CPC Phase 1 Studies of Coal Technologies with CO2 Capture, EPRI Report 1004880, April (2004)

Google Scholar

[6] Skakir Khambaty: Application of the Econamine FGSM Plus Process to Canadian Coal-Based Power Plants, presented at Clean Coal Session of Combustion Canada Conference, Vancouver, Canada, September 22-24, (2003)

Google Scholar

[7] TAG® Technical Assessment Guide: Volume 3, Revision 8: Fundamentals and Methods Electricity Supply, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 1999. TR-100281-V3R8.

Google Scholar