Risk Management of Induced Micro-Seismicity Caused by Hydraulic Fracturing through Acoustic Emission

Article Preview

Abstract:

To release the shale gas potential in China, hydraulic fracturing technologies play an important role. However, the latent technique risk deserves special attention. For example, the site-nearby micro-seismicity may have some relationship with the hydraulic fracturing. Nonetheless, the good news is that carbon dioxide stimulation can be used to displace hydraulic fracturing and obviate the potential earthquake risk. But the carbon dioxide methods are not economical nowadays, and hydraulic fracturing will continue to dominate. Through acoustic emission monitor, the reservoir characteristics and induced micro-seismicity magnitude and frequency will be collected and evaluated. Based on pre-existing project experience and numerical simulation, difference assessment standards about the hydraulic fracturing parameters are proposed to evaluate the micro-seismicity risk. Combined with other characteristics of rock property and fault location, this risk management can be used to guide the subsequent drilling and mining in practice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 734-737)

Pages:

628-633

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview.

Google Scholar

[2] J. ZHANG, B. Xu, H. NIE, et al: Natural Gas Industry, Vol. 6(2008) p.48.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Wiseman: Fordham Environmental Law Review, Vol. 20(2009) p.115.

Google Scholar

[4] E.L. Majer, R. Baria, M. Stark, et al: Geothermics, Vol. 36(2007) No.3, pp.185-222.

Google Scholar

[5] B.W. Hainey, R.G. Keck, M.B. Smith, et al: Old Production & Facilities, Vol. 14(1999) No.2, pp.83-87.

Google Scholar

[6] J.M. Cleary, J.C. FRYE: Hydraulic Fracture Theory,(Illinois State Geological Survey, 1959).

Google Scholar

[7] S.G. Osborn, A. Vengosh, N.R. Warner, et al: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 108(2011) No.20, pp.8172-8176.

Google Scholar

[8] V.M. Yarushina, D. Bercovici: Geophysical Research Letters (2013).

Google Scholar

[9] T. Ishida, K. Aoyagi, T. Niwa, et al: Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39(2012) No.16, p.L16309.

Google Scholar

[10] Information on http://www.technologyreview.com/news/512656/skipping-the-water-in-fracking

Google Scholar

[11] C.E. Everson, S. Hoessein Cheraghi: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 39(1999) No.3, pp.371-387.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(98)00054-6

Google Scholar

[12] A. Lavrov: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 40(2003) No.2, pp.151-171.

Google Scholar

[13] R.G. Agarwal, R.D. Carter, C.B. Pollock: Journal of Petroleum Technology, Vol. 31(1979) No.3, pp.362-372.

Google Scholar

[14] Information on http://earthquake.usgs.gov/.

Google Scholar

[15] E.L. Majer, T.V. McEvilly: Geophysics, Vol. 44(1979) No.2, pp.246-269.

Google Scholar

[16] E.L. Majer, J.E. Peterson: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 44(2007) No.8, pp.1079-1090.

Google Scholar

[17] Information on http://esd.lbl.gov/research/projects/induced_seismicity/egs/geysers.html.

Google Scholar

[18] N. Deichmann, D. Giardini: Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 80(2009) No.5, pp.784-798.

Google Scholar

[19] M.O. Häring, U. Schanz, F. Ladner, et al: Geothermics, Vol. 37(2008) No.5, pp.469-495.

Google Scholar

[20] D. Mayer-Rosa, B. Cadiot: Tectonophysics, Vol. 53(1979) No.3, pp.325-333.

Google Scholar

[21] J.T. Rutledge, W.S. Phillips: Geophysics, Vol. 68(2003) No.2, pp.441-452.

Google Scholar

[22] J.T. Rutledge, W.S. Phillips: 2002 SEG Annual Meeting, (2002).

Google Scholar

[23] S.A. Shapiro, C. Dinske: Geophysical Prospecting, Vol. 57(2009) No.2, pp.301-310.

Google Scholar