Comparative Assessment of Urban Drainage Systems in Different Cities Based on Substance Flow Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper the substance flow analysis (SFA) method was employed to map the water, COD-C, TN-N flows in urban drainage system, focusing on the pathways of contaminants to urban water environment. As case studies, four cities were selected for the comparative assessments using the statistical data of 2011.Through examining the fluxes of three sources (effluent of WWTPs, wastewater discharged without treatment, and urban storm runoff) of COD-C and TN-N emission, analysis and discussionwere made based on different units of measurements.The results showed that the load of COD-C was in the range of 16.50~80.25 kg/y/capand 131.44~227.58 t/y/km2, and TN-Nwas in the range of 1.20~5.43 kg/y/capand 9.57~23.18 t/y/km2.Taking considerations ofproportional relationship among the three origins, urban storm runoff released the majority of COD-C to receiving water, accounting more than 60% of the total. For TN-N flows, effluent of WWTPs and urban storm runoff wereidentified as the major contributors, accumulated contribution of 85%.Thus, the outcomes from these substance flow analyses, suggested that a reduction in pollution could be achieved by improvingstormwater management and upgrading emission standard of WWTPs, and proved itself as an effective tool for urban wastewater management as well.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

290-299

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook (China Planning Press, China 2012).

Google Scholar

[2] B. Paul and R. Helmut. Practical handbook of material flow analysis (CRC Press, U.S. 2004).

Google Scholar

[3] L. Liebig and L. Playfair. Chemistry in its application to agriculture and physiology (Wiley and Putnam Press, U.S. 1847).

Google Scholar

[4] T. E. Graedel, D. van Beer, M. Bertram, et al: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 39 (2005), p.7060.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Johnson,L. Schewel, and T. E, Graedel: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 44 (2010), p.4657.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Ma, K. Matsubae, K. Nakajima, et al: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 56 (2011), p.134.

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Yuan, J. Shi,H. Wu, et al: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 92 (2011), p. (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Elshkaki, E. van Voet,M. Van Holderbeke, et al: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 42 (2004), p.133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.008

Google Scholar

[9] H. Hatayama,I. Daigo, Y. Matsuno, et al: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 44 (2010), p.4657.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Matsuno,T. Hur, V. Fthenakis: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 61 (2012), p.83.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Hatayama, H. Yamada, I. Daigo, et al: Materials Transactions, Vol. 48 (2007, p.2518.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Hashimoto,Y. Moriguchi, A. Saito, et al: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 40 (20104), p.201.

Google Scholar

[13] D. van Beers, and T. E. Graedel: Journal of Clean Production, Vol. 15 (2007), p.849.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Tabayashi,I. Daigo, and Y. Matsuno: ISIJ International, Vol. 49 (2009), p.1256.

Google Scholar

[15] X. Dong, J. N. Chen, S. Y. Zeng,P. F. Du: Water & Wastewater Engineering, Vol. 37 (2011), p.137. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] L. Benedetti, G. Drickx, D. Bixio, et al: Journal of Urban Water, Vol. 3 (2006), p.33.

Google Scholar

[17] N. Chevre,C. Guignard,L. Rossi, et al: Water Science and Technology, Vol. 63 (2011), p.1341.

Google Scholar

[18] China Meteorological Administration. http: /cdc. cma. gov. cn/home. do.

Google Scholar

[19] G. Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, C. J. Yang, et al: Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, Vol. 21 (2008), p.18. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[20] H. Y. Gan,M. N. Zhou,D. Q. Li, et al: Ecology and Environment, Vol. 15 (2006), p.969. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[21] J. Zhang: China water & wastewater, Vol. 26 (2010), p.58. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[22] S. F. Chen,L. J. Liu,Q. W. Zhang, et al: Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, Vol. 27 (2012), p.80. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[23] G. R. Huang, andT. F. Nie: Journal of South China University of Technology (Nature Science Edition), Vol. 40 (2012), p.142. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[24] W. S. Xin. Engineering design and full-scale test of Jinan Xingji river wastewater treatment plant. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology. 2006. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[25] Y. W. Zhou, andH. B. Zhao. Theories and calculations of urban drainage network(China Architecture & Building Press, China 2000). (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[26] X. J. Zhang, andX. Huang. Principle and technology of water and wastewater physio-chemical treatment. (Tsinghua University Press, China 2011). (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[27] GB/T 18920-2002, Water quality standard for urban miscellaneous water consumption. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[28] H. Y. Cao,S. B. Huang,J. Y. Li, et al: Journal of Water Resource & Water Engineering, Vol. 22 (2011), p.66. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[29] X. Dong,P. F. Du, Z. Y. Li, et al: Environmental Science, Vol. 29 (2008), p.607. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[30] T. Sui. Analysis of potential of rainwater utilization in urban area of Jinan. Jinan: Shandong Jianzhu University. 2008. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar