The "U-Type" Wells History of Fuzzy Ball Drilling Fluids for CBM Drilling in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

The fuzzy ball drilling fluids have been developed on the basis of the circulation foam and Aphron to control lost circulation effectively. There are some difficulties in drilling U-type well, such as well-bore stability, cutting carrying problem, large torque and friction at the horizontal section, and formation damage to coal-bed. The objective of this paper was to show some applications of fuzzy ball drilling fluids on U-type wells of the Ordos Basin and prove the superiority of fuzzy ball drilling fluid in CBM drilling. To the three mentioned cases, the density of fuzzy ball drilling fluid was 0.90~1.18g/cm3, the funnel viscosity was 45~72s, the dynamic shear force was 12~19 Pa, the PV was 13~19mPa·s and the pH was ranged from 7 to 9. To use the fuzzy ball drilling fluids, the average ROP increased above 10% with no borehole complexity, such as stuck pipe, hole enlargement causing poor cleaning and etc. These cases reflected excellent properties of the fuzzy ball drilling fluids including effectively sealing, good carrying and suspension ability, formation damage control and compatible weighted by inert materials. Furthermore, the fuzzy ball drilling fluids will not affect BHA tools like motors and MWD in CBM drilling.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1273-1276

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Zifeng, Dai Jiang. Controlling technique on navigating path of horizontal butt well and corss-well. Natural Gas Industry, 21 (2): 70-72. (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Sun Jianping. Probe in to features of drilling fluid in coal-bed gaswell. Coal G eology of China, 15 (4): 61-62, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] Mclellan, P.J., H awkes, C.D. Assessing borehole instability risks for horizontal well in coals and fractured shales. Presested at the 4th Annual Unconventional Gas Conference, Calgary, Alberta, October 23-25. (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] Reid,P. et al. Associate polyer for invasion control in water and oil-based muds and in cementing spacers: Laboratory and field case histories. Paper AADE-04-DF-HO-33. American Association of Drilling Engineering Drilling Fluids Conference, Houston, TX, April 6-7. (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] Palmer, I.D., Cameron J.R. Looking for permeability loss or gain during coalbed methane production , Paper 0515, 2005 Int, Coalbed Methane Symp., Tuscaloosa, AL, May 17-19, 19 pp. (2005).

Google Scholar

[6] ZHENG Lihui, ZUO Feng, WANG Shan, et al. State of the art in the micro-bubble-based drilling fluids in China OIL DRILLING & PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 32(1): 10-16. (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] Yuehua SUI, Xiaohua CHENG, Qiang SUN, et al. Research and Application of Recirculating Foam Drilling and Completion Fluid. SPE 59267. (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] Zheng Lihui, CAO Yuan, HAN Zixuan. Novel low-density drilling fluid containing fuzzy ball structure. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 31(3): 490-493. (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] ZHANG Zhenhua. The research and application on micro-bubble based drilling fluids. Oil Journal, 25 (6): 92-95. (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] HAN Baoshan. Under balance pressure drilling technology and coalbed gas development. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 30(4): 61-62. (2002).

Google Scholar