Development of Mathematical Modeling and Dynamics for Biofilms

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biofilm formation, structure and dynamics properties play an important role in the effective performance of biofilm wastewater treatment reactors. Biofilm models are commonly used as simulation tools in engineering applications and as research tools to study biofilm formation and dynamics. This paper briefly outlines the present and past status of research on biofilm modeling, dynamics and experimental results. Biofilms constitute a spectrum of dynamical microorganisms, whose interaction with the surrounding environment and thereby induced dynamics dominates the complex properties of the living microorganism. Modeling of biofilms began with a low dimensional continuum description first based on kinematics and translational diffusions; later, more sophisticated microscopic dynamical mechanisms are introduced leading to the anomalous diffusion and dissipation encountered by various components in biofilms. We classify the models into roughly four classes: the reaction-diffusion dynamics model, the Capdeville biofilm growth dynamics model, the Cellular automata (CA) model, and the Phase field biofilm dynamical model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

93-98

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.R. Noguera, S. Okabe and C. Picioreanu: Water Science and Technology, 39(7) (1999), pp.273-278.

Google Scholar

[2] C.P. L Grady Jr, G.T. Daigger and H.C. Lim: Biological Wastewater Treatment: Revised and Expanded. 2nd ed. New York: Marcal Dekker, Inc. (1999). pp. 72l~747, 812, 763~840.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Zhang, N. Cogan, Q. Wang: SIAM, J. Appl. Math. 69 (2008), pp.41-669.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Zhang, N. Cogan, Q. Wang: Commun. Comput. Phys. 4 (2008), p.72—101.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Colasanti: Cellular automata models of microbial colonies, Binary, 4 (1992), pp.191-193.

Google Scholar

[6] J.W.T. Wimpenny and R. Colasanti: FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 22(1) (1997), pp.1-16.

Google Scholar

[7] S. W. Hcrmanowicz: Mathematical Biosciences, 169(1) (2001), pp.1-14.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Picioreanu, M.C. M Loosdreeht and J.J. Heijnen: Water Sci. & Tech. 39(7) (1999), p.115~122.

Google Scholar

[9] B.E. Rittmann, M. Pettis, H.W. Reeves et a1: Water Sci. and Tech., 39(7) (1999). p.99~105.

Google Scholar

[10] C.S. Laspidou and B.E. Rittmann: Water Research, 38 (14-15) (2004), p.3349~3361.

Google Scholar

[11] G. Pizarro, D. Griffeath and D.R. Noguera: J. of Environment Eng., 127(9) (2001). pp.782-789.

Google Scholar

[12] O. Wanner and P. Reichert: Biotechnology Bioengineering. 49 (1996 ), pp.172-184.

Google Scholar

[13] C.S. Laspidou, A. Kungolos andP. Samaras: Desalination, 250, (2009), p.390–394.

Google Scholar

[14] J. Dockery, I. Klapper, SIAM. J. Appl. Math. 62 (2001) pp.853-869.

Google Scholar

[15] C.S. Laspidou and B.E. Rittmann: Water Research, 38(14-15) (2004), p.3362~3372.

Google Scholar