Effects of Process Parameters on the Particle Size Distribution of Graphene Oxide Aqueous Dispersion

Xue Bing Hu; Yun Yu; Jian Er Zhou; Li Xin Song

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.750-752.1113

Paper Titles

Preparation, Characterization and Photocatalytic Properties of Ag-Loaded Bi₂WO₆
p.1091

Synthesis of Mesoporous Polyaniline-TiO₂ Composite Microspheres for Gas Sensing Application
p.1098

Syntheses, Characterization and Crystal Structure of Zn (II) Complex Constructed from Ferrocenedicarboxylic Acid
p.1104

Preparation and Properties Investigation of Gadolinium Arylate/Hydrogenated Nitrile-Butadiene Rubber Composites
p.1109

Effects of Process Parameters on the Particle Size Distribution of Graphene Oxide Aqueous Dispersion
p.1113

SiO/C Composite Materials for Lithium-Ion Secondary Batteries
p.1117

Preparation and Growth Characteristics of Mesocarbon Microbeads
p.1121

Novel Copolymers of N-[(4-bromo-3,5- difluorine) phenyl] acryl- amide with Methyl Methacrylate: Synthesis, Characterization and Thermal Properties
p.1125

Effects of In Situ Formation of Magnesium Aluminate Spinel on Performance of Modified Sizing Nozzle
p.1130

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 750-752Effects of Process Parameters on the Particle Size...

Effects of Process Parameters on the Particle Size Distribution of Graphene Oxide Aqueous Dispersion

Abstract:

During graphene oxide separation process, the effects of the process parameters such as centrifugal separation time and ultrasonic treatment time on the particle size distribution of graphene oxide aqueous dispersion were studied. The results show graphene oxide has the narrower particle size distribution and the smaller nominal effective particle size with increasing the centrifugal separation time from 20 min to 160 min. And there is a critical time in the ultrasonic treatment to obtain the narrower particle size distribution and smaller nominal effective particle size of graphene oxide. Graphene oxide has the narrower particle size distribution and the smaller nominal effective particle size when the ultrasonic treatment time is 4 h.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 750-752)

Pages:

1113-1116

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.750-752.1113

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Xue Bing Hu*, Yun Yu, Jian Er Zhou, Li Xin Song

Keywords:

Graphene Oxide, Particle Size Distribution, Process Parameter

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] G.S. Gund, D.P. Dubal, B.H. Patil, S.S. Shinde and C.D. Lokhande: Electrochim. Acta Vol. 92 (2013), p.205.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Liu, L. Wang, J. Gao, J. Zhao, X. Gao and Z. Chen: Carbon Vol. 50 (2012), p.1690.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Zhang, J. Zhou, Q. Wang and P. Jena: J. Phys. Chem. C Vol. 117 (2013), p.1064.

Google Scholar

[4] D.R. Dreyer and C.W. Bielawski: Chem. Sci Vol. 2 (2011), p.1233.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Song, J. Yang, J. Zeng, J. Tan and L. Zhang: Sensor. Actuat. B: Chem Vol. 155 (2011), p.220.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Saner, F. Okyay and Y. Yürüm: Fuel Vol. 89 (2010), p. (1903).

Google Scholar

[7] S.D. Perera, R.G. Mariano, N. Nijem, Y. Chabal, J.P. Ferraris and K.J. Balkus: J. Power Sources Vol. 215 (2012), p.1.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.059

Google Scholar

[8] S. Liu, T.H. Zeng, M. Hofmann, E. Burcombe, J. Wei, R. Jiang, J. Kong and Y. Chen: ACS Nano Vol. 5 (2011), p.6971.

Google Scholar

[9] D.R. Dreyer, S. Park, C.W. Bielawski and R.S. Ruoff: Chem. Soc. Rev Vol. 39 (2010), p.228.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. He, G. Huang, J. Jiang, Q. Zhang and H. Cui: Carbon Vol. 56 (2013), p.201.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Pan and I.A. Aksay: ACS Nano Vol. 5 (2011), p.4073.

Google Scholar

[12] L. Zhang, J. Liang, Y. Huang, Y. Ma, Y. Wang and Y. Chen: Carbon Vol. 47(2009), p.3365.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Yao, X. Chen, H. Guo and Z. Wu: Appl. Surf. Sci Vol. 257 (2011), p.7778.

Google Scholar

[14] G.X. Wang, B. Wang, J.S. Park, J. Yang, X.P. Shen and J. Yao: Carbon Vol. 47 (2009), p.68.

Google Scholar

[15] S.B. Liu, T.Y.H. Zeng, M. Hofmann, E. Burcombe, J. Wei, R.R. Jiang, J. Kong and Y. Chen: ACS Nano Vol. 5 (2011), p.6971.

Google Scholar